Rape Prevention: A New Advocate for Open-Ended Prevention Theory

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I've been banned for it like half a dozen times, all in the last couple of years. Guess you don't pay much attention.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You tell How SICK were the American and Russian soldiers when they entered Germany during the war11, you tell me why are you attempting to get drunk a female in a bar , you know your motive . And you telling me sick , you are a bunch of hypocrites.

 

Usually I get the female drunk at home. Also, it saves time on preprepared videocamera stations.

 

I've never defended the war crimes of soldiers and I've never tried to pick up a drunk girl in a bar.

But I do know the difference between masturbation and rape.

I also know an idiot when I see one.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others" Fraggle Rocker is in a position of power therefore is exempt from the rules of us commoners. Hypocritical I know. But hey we needed people to keep other commoners from using that kind of language so the cost to us is a double standard.

 

How does one "RAPE" themselves with their own hand?
Pretty sure there is very steep line between the two. :shrug:

Rape: Noun
The unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse.
Masturbation: Noun
The stimulation or manipulation of one's own genitals, especially to orgasm; sexual self-gratification.
Last time I checked my hands are not people with their own wills and desires that forced me to masturbate or slipped drugs into my drink or just beat in the back of the head with a gun.

 

In a perfect world...

Studies show pornography and abuse to be prevalent in convicted sex offenders. Depravity is prevalent worldwide, sexual assault is a symptom of that depravity. There are ways to reduce the prevalence, but unfortunately not completely prevent it short of Revelations 20.

 

Now I am replaying to one.

 

The question again why people commit rape ?

 

Now I am replaying to one.

 

I know. It's because they have hands, isn't it? Those handed bastards.

 

Here's a question: the paradigm of the psychological basis of rape is taken these days - I think - as a power issue.

Yet the rape of children by Catholic priests is considered to be a sexual one - again, I believe, recently - as an issue of sexual deprivation and repression.

Do these contrast, or have I misread these relative paradigms?

 

depending on the laws( I live in georgia so that what I'm basing this off of) the establishment if they served him when he was noticibly intoxicated are civilly liable for damages he causes. any place that serves alcohol should have policies in place to prevent this.

 

do what the fuck really the whole she wanted defense really. dude I'm a guy and that sickens me that such an attitude exists.

 

The thing about keeping all of that stuff invisible is that you can't draw any credibility for the process amongst the general membership from it. You guys might well have orderly, productive processes in place, or it might just be a highly politicized shouting match - us mere mortals have no way of knowing and so no way of being impressed when the process or its results are invoked.

In some cases it was only one.

To be clear, most of the bans were notionally for "insult." But neither I nor anybody else ever seems to get banned for non-profane insults, and nor does profanity that isn't directed at any particular poster seem to get sanctioned. So the precedent seems to add up to a rule against profane insults. But, throw in the personal vendettas that certain powers have against me, and maybe talk of "precedent" is too idealized.

I can assure you that you (collectively) do not allow me, personally, to address people here in significantly stronger terms than that. In fact I'd wager that I would catch a ban for calling certain specific powers here "bastard."

If you're going to exclude the question of whether the bans are just at the outset, then you clearly don't want to know.

Let's just say that there are limits to my respect for authority and that I prefer to catch a ban than to compromise on certain things. Actually, let's go a bit further and say that certain of them were done on purpose, both to make a point and to give me a vacation when I've needed to concentrate on other things.

Nah, that's not it. I am a veteran curser - spent years as the head editor of a publication that is infamous for its vulgar content, in fact - and so I know how to modulate the swearing and use it for maximum effect. Indeed, that seems to be a big part of the motivation against it. This does not represent any lack of control on my part, nor is the offending material characterized by especially profuse concentrations of swearing. Likewise, I have no trouble refraining from cursing when such is appropriate to my point and the situation I am dealing with (as evidenced by my output in recent months). Anyway I'm sure the same issues will arise again at some point, so you can watch for yourself at that time.

Again, the "precedent" seems to be the combination of profanity and insult. Insults alone seem to go right by, as does profanity not directed at anyone in particular. When combined, at least by myself, the result is a ban. Given the source of these bans, I am quite confident that you will get exactly nowhere in "investigating" them, but thanks for your statement there regardless.