http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=40635 Really? I thought that I was asking a rhetorical question, to start a discussion about the scandalous actions of CBS, and then expressing my opinion: As far as the "flashy" images, I was not aware that it is against forum rules to POST PICS. As far as "PROPAGANDA", I LOOKED CLOSELY at the political forum rules and found no reference to the word at all! And again, if my post was about propaganda, then what about the statements made by the other members that I picked randomly & listed, wellcookedfetus? If those are not propaganda, then what is? This is ridiculous. How can anyone back up their opinion with any more evidence than their opinion itself? Besides, if everyone had to back up their "opinions" with evidence before posting, there would be no one posting at the political forum. As far as valid arguments go, there hardly are any at all! I have looked through just a few of the other recent posts by the members and have seen countless statements made that were not substantiated with any evidence, referrals to evidence, or links to prove their statements. These are just a few examples: Really? What evidence does this member have to even begin to prove that such a thing has ever happened? Is there any evidence to show that this statement is true ?