Quantifying gravity's mechanism

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by quantum_wave, Apr 4, 2013.

  1. river

    Messages:
    11,058
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. rr6 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    635
    Cosmological Constant/metric = Dark Energy/repulsive

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    11,058
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. quantum_wave Contemplating the "as yet" unknown Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,625
    Are any of the old timers who participated in this thread still around, somewhere? If you want to pick up where you left off, be my guest.
     
  8. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,909
    I can't be bothered to read it but I did like the idea of push gravity.
    I worked up the idea only to find LeSage did so in 1745.
    But folk think it is a crazy idea yet I still like it.
    I don't see it as in conflict with GR but GR folk hate it.
    Alex
     
    quantum_wave likes this.
  9. quantum_wave Contemplating the "as yet" unknown Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,625
    Thanks Alex. When I read through the old thread it is obvious that most of the active members from 2013 have moved on. I thought some might get an alert when a new post showed up in an old thread that had been so active back then, giving them encouragement to come back, and maybe get active in the community again. Of course that won't work with banned members, and my threads were often focal points for controversy between those who know everything, and those who question everything, lol.
     
  10. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    You worked up the idea of push gravity, thats fine, but please tell how it does not conflict with GR?
     
  11. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,909
    Well that is in my mind.
    I have thought of GR as trying to describe the movement of space and how space flows I suppose that is my crude way of expressing it and its (GR) math describes that reality ..the same reality I see as push gravity which is a flow of space but it lacks any math.
    My fundamental belief is that there is no force of attraction.
    I believe all perception that we have and call attraction comes from a one way force.
    I have reasons but nothing scientific.
    I just can not envisage a machinery in nature where attraction could work simply because messages would have to be a two way system...
    Alex
     
  12. quantum_wave Contemplating the "as yet" unknown Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,625
    The premise of the thread depicted gravity as a two way street, in the sense that particles and objects are composed of gravitational wave energy with two components, inflowing and out flowing. The directionally inflowing component comes from distant objects, and leads back to the source object. The out flowing gravitational wave energy from those distant objects originates as the spherically emitted gravitational wave energy that, hypothetically, is emitted by all particles and objects. Particles and object feed each other, and the space between them is filled with gravitational wave energy coming and going in all directions.

    Long after this thread was originated, there was confirmation of the out flowing component, when LIGO detected gravitational waves; the out flowing wave energy from a massive black hole event. The pattern in those waves showed an inswirling signature painted by the massive distant event, that was detected at the LIGO instrument; a chirping that culminated at the moment of collision.
     

Share This Page