Pseudoskepticism and evidence for precognition

Discussion in 'Science & Society' started by Magical Realist, May 17, 2011.

  1. Dinosaur Rational Skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,584
    I have not read all the Posts to this Thread & apologize if any remarks similar to mine have already been Posted.

    The link from Magic Realist Post #1 got me to “Page not found”

    BTW: Anecdotes are not evidence.

    There is no evidence supporting precognition, which belongs in the category of ESP along with telepathy, psychokinesis, & Uri Geller stage performances.

    From Nicolas1M7 Post # 25
    An extraordinary claim lacking any supporting evidence. Such claims require extraordinary evidence to be worthy of consideration.

    BTW: Since the development of Quantum Theory circa 1910-1925, the belief in deterministic laws of physics have been discarded & replaced by the notion that the classical world of our senses is supported by probabilistic laws.

    A claim for precognition is a claim that there are folks who can predict the results of dice throws under typical Vegas Casino conditions.

    Before some silly Posts are made, I acknowledge that there are some events we can predict with a high degree of accuracy. Example: A 20 story fall head first onto a concrete pavement will be lethal. Jokers say “It is not the fall that kills; It is the sudden stop.”

    From Magic Realist Post # 27
    Do you really consider these sources credible? I do not & I question the rationality of those who do accept such sources as worthy of consideration.

    From Magic Realist Post #40
    There are over 100 million adults in the USA who are active for circa 14 to 16 hours per day. If there were not a lot of seemingly surprising coincidences, it would be evidence that there was some bizarre phenomenon or active conspiracy artificially keeping the number of coincidences lower than one would expect.
     
    origin likes this.
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page