Proposal: That the current global warming trend has nothing to do with human actions.

Discussion in 'Formal debates' started by James R, Nov 30, 2007.

  1. Edufer Tired warrior Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    791
    ... eight,... nine,... ten... You are out!

    I guess the debate is over.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,354
    Edufer:

    Please read the rules of the Formal Debates forum. A Proposal thread is not the place to debate. See the sticky threads that explain how this works.

    Regarding this particular proposal thread, my offer to debate Buffalo Roam expired 7 days after I posted the first post. I might be willing to debate a similar topic with you at some stage, but in the lead up to Christmas I am quite busy with other things and I don't think I can devote the time to doing this properly right now.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    If your theory is correct, your timing is sure off! 1998 was nine years ago and the warming trend is STILL continuing upwards - ever since then and until this very day.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. madanthonywayne Morning in America Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,461
    You might be willing at "some stage"? What happened to this guy:
    Edufer responded to you the next day! Then, suddenly, it's too late to debate. No time! Can't do it right now! So one day, you're taunting the "resident global-warming deniers", and the very next day; there's no time for a debate?
     
  8. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,354
    Correct. As I explained quite clearly, my time is limited. I specified a time frame.
     
  9. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Well, let's hope that you two can come to an arrangement. This forum has been less than a rousing success so far.
     
  10. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,354
    Few people are willing to put in the requisite time and effort, invert. (I don't see you volunteering, by the way...)

    Still, I'm happy to leave this one on a slow burn for a while.
     
  11. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    I'm far too chaotic for this sort of thing. Most sciforumers are, methinks. Hence the poor ratings in here.
     

Share This Page