I will argue the negative, that it cannot be properly inferred. I wish someone to argue the affirmative, or at least try to rebut my argument. Format: 1. Opening (me) 2. Rebuttal 1 (opponent) 3. Rebuttal 2 (me) 4. Rebuttal 3 (opponent) 5 Conclusion (me) We can work out the details later. For now I want to get a sense of who's interested. I'm even willing to take on up to four opponents simultaneously. The format for that debate would look like: 1. Opening (me) 2. Rebuttal 1 (opponents 1, 2, 3, and 4) 3. Rebuttal 2 (me) 4. Rebuttal 3(opponents 1, 2, 3, and 4) 5. conclusion (me) My opponents would, of course, write separate responses (whether those responses overlap in content is another matter), and I will respond to each of them in my subsequent rebuttals. I will even allow my opponents to confer with each other and work as a team. Any takers?