Possible Alien War Tactics

I think there idea is closer to bombing runs... but a bombing run has to much in coming with a meteor breaking up. I think that's the only reason they've gone for automatic fire.

Plus (one of them) previously said that Mars had an atmosphere before (and supposedly during) this war. If this was the case, you wouldn't get neat evenly spaced lines anyway. And you sure has hell wouldn't have the number of random crater impact sites that we see in only 50 or so years without an atmosphere.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The fun part about this is that it can be speculated about all we want.

Strafing runs are done from above and usually are the results of firing upon another object moving on or close to the surface. These are far larger automatic weapons systems strikes on Mars than what our aircraft use. But they sure look basically the same.

The bigger chains on the various moons and planetoids seem to indicate far larger ships were involved than what would be called the mopping up on Mars.

Just thinking.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Hahaa...Norval, i see you have evaded answering my question again. Very well, it is my opinion you and FieryIce are posting irrelevant links in a desperate and less than honest attempt to defend your theory. My advice to you, kid, is to stop doing this. It just makes you both look dumber than you already are.

i leave viewers to judge for yourselves the link posted by FieryIce and their attempts at discussion of their "theory".

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Arch Rival
If you actually read the posts above your very first time you even asked that question, you would have noted that it was all ready answered. Besides as this is the ALIEN WAR TACTICS thread and not entirely about Cunningham / Smart types of crater chains but also inclusive of all possible evidence and discussion of such. That includes radiation readings of many places all over our solar system besides Mars.

For those that want to look at some interesting data try these links.
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA02816_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA02817_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA02818_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA02819_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA03479_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA03480_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA03486_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA03487_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA03488_modest.jpg
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpegMod/PIA03745_modest.jpg

Enjoy.

 

Ok, and why do you think this radiation is higher then it should be?

 

I didn't say that.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

But what would it's normal be?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

:m:

 

Well that's what you're implying by posting the above links in a thread about your theory.

Not that your actually going to read and use any of it, but here ya go:
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/Radmath.htm

 

Hahaa.....No, Norval. You didn't answer the question. But then, this is a familiar drill for you, isn't it? Evading questions by insisting they have been answered before?

Of course you would like to evade the questions. The reason is plain and simple: you haven't the intellectual capacity to answer them.

Do you require a reminder of how many questions you evaded?
You will get one anyway.
For the benefit of those who didn't look through the links i posted, allow me to give a glimpse into what is happening at other forums.

"Craterchains, thank you for addressing all the points and questions people directed at you. It was very forthcoming and professional of you to do so. Watching this flow of information between you and the others here has shown me that you are indeed a reasonable and polite person who truely believes what he says and offers proof and evidence to those that doubt. You are certainly not to be confused with those others who merely repeat the same things over and over with no regard for other people's posts. You certainly cannot be said to have ignored questions repeatedly. You have answered every apparent contradiction with dignity and, in the end, you have shown that your hypothesis is the most likely one for this phenomena. Your data and evidence have convinced me beyond a doubt that you are corect."
-Musashi

This response was a sacastic remark addressed to Norval. The context can be found here:
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=13844&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=150

"You've continued to ignore everything that everyone in this thread has patiently explained to you. You've learned nothing, and you still apparently do not even understand why your "work" is incapable of convincing anyone of anything. You also appear to fail to understand (or at least, are unwilling to recognize or admit you understand) what you need to do in order to produce work that could even be worthy of discussion."
-aurora
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=13844&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=100

Enjoy the quote of the day. A taste of things to come.

 

Arch Rival
And your point in this thread is?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Persol
Just one point that is readily discernable so far.
That the heavily cratered high lands of Mars is HOT.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Maybe this newer version map will help?
http://themis-data.asu.edu/mars-bin..._SELECT_ZOOM=ZOOM&MAP_IMG.x=259&MAP_IMG.y=186

 

And your point is?

Get this, the Sun is even hotter. Aliens must have attacked it as well.

 

My point is simple. Your theory is basically trash, but to keep "discussion" going, you keep bringing in all sorts of irrelevant links. Trying to deceive others into thinking you still have useful material.

More reviews for you, Norval?

"Look, man, haven't you read what others have said about tidal forces? Are you going to listen? Are you going to tell us why the current explanation is impossible, or are you going to just say that it is?!"
-Gullible Jones
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/v...tart=175&sid=209c726ae3f1559f7403ff44b8d3215c

And oh yeah, viewers may want to check out badastronomy.com forums. Read the last post to see why Norval got banned.

 

Arch_Rival's apparent tactic in this war tactics thread is basically the same tactic used by Miss Saigon in the Vietnam war but this thread is about alien war tactics.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

And I quote: "craterchains, like so many pseudoscientists before him, will never be convinced his premise is wrong, nor can he even be convinced to think about it in a reasonable way. No more can be gained from this."

But it's so true icy!

Maybe you, norval, brad, zarkov and fluid should rethink the whole "I'm never wrong" approach.

 

The most intriguing aspect of the final moments in this Alien War would be the tactics being used in information gathering and control. The stand of those that got their butts kicked all over the place, and finally in our own solar system, at least from my perspective, would be the last ditch attempt at information control.

Deceit, deceptions, lies, slander, are all tools of their control tactics. They have nothing left but a whimpering and whining because they lost.

Cunningham / Smart types of crater chains are one kind of weapon, there are many more.

 

You have yet to show ONE weapon. Don't start making stuff up about multiple weapons now.

Regardless, a line of craters is STILL not a weapon. Stryder just showed you that they aren't even uniform.

 

Oh no, Norval. What delusions. You now think you had your butt kicked all over the galaxy, and finally get kicked here, so you are on a mission to propagate dis-information and to whine and whimper?

That's sad.......

 

In direct contradiction to the quote;

"History is written by the Victor"

 

No Arch_Rival, again you twist what was posted, the BET's got their butts kicked not Norval (human).

Yes phlogger, history has been written by the victor and the losers are trying their best last ditch effort to control, good analogy.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Fiery, missing the point. The victors would make sure we knew the history from their pov, the losers would not be in a position to 'control'. The victors re-writing history IS that control, get it? IE, control is not exercised by the losers. How many more ways can I say it?

 

As was noted, the war ain’t over, yet.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!