Poll 2 on the validity of a more complex argument

Terms?
I don't use the word "term" in the OP.

All the words I used are to be understood on the basis of an English dictionary.
For example, "logic". What's not to understand?
Here is the argument again:

For all we know, A may be the state of some unknown part of B;
C is determined by the state of some unknown part of B;
Therefore, for all we know, C may be determined by A​

All the terms such as "state", "determine", "unknown", "part" etc. are to be understood in their ordinary senses as given by an English dictionary.
A, B and C are to be understood as variables that can stand for and may be substituted with any specific term, such as "wave", "traffic light", "conscious mind" etc.

Yes?

I hope this is good enough for you.
EB

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.