Perceptions of sciforums moderation

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by James R, Apr 13, 2009.

?

Compared to other online forums, the moderation of sciforums is (tick all that apply)

Poll closed Apr 27, 2009.
  1. not strict enough

    20.9%
  2. less strict

    41.9%
  3. equally as strict

    14.0%
  4. more strict

    11.6%
  5. too strict

    2.3%
  6. much less affected by the personal biases of moderators

    9.3%
  7. a little less affected by the personal biases of moderators

    11.6%
  8. about the same in terms of moderator bias

    23.3%
  9. a little more affected by the personal biases of moderators

    16.3%
  10. hopelessly affected by the personal biases of moderators

    9.3%
  11. applied arbitrarily by moderators without any clear guidelines

    16.3%
  12. applied somewhat more arbitrarily

    20.9%
  13. applied with about the same moderator discretion

    16.3%
  14. more strictly in accordance with the published rules

    2.3%
  15. always rigidly applied according to the rules

    4.7%
  16. hopelessly below par, even for unpaid volunteers

    11.6%
  17. somewhat less competent

    9.3%
  18. about the same in terms of moderator competence

    20.9%
  19. somewhat more competent

    14.0%
  20. very good, given that moderators are unpaid volunteers

    48.8%
  21. I do not wish to participate in this poll

    7.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. copernicus66 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    639
    Pretty much. Like I mentioned earlier, you and Tiassa are two sides of the same coin, except his word count is *much* higher.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. copernicus66 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    639
    Quite often, what Tiassa spends pages writing could be condensed into a paragraph or two. The simple fact of the matter is that he doesn't have the decency to do so.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. copernicus66 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    639
    So, I got warned for insulting a member, by *Skinwalker*. Now how's *that* for irony? Another example of the arbitrary moderation on this shit hole of a forum
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    and this is the moderator of ethics, morality and justice. did charles manson turn the position down first?
     
  8. copernicus66 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    639
    Yeah, it's truly fucked up that we have such an individual moderating Ethics, Morality and Justice.

    Some moderators have been in their position for too long, and they have grown arrogant, cocky and haughty. They know nothing can touch them. It's time to prove them wrong. It's time for them to be torn forcibly from their thrones and throw into the plebeian masses.
     
  9. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Were you punching a fist in the air as you typed that?

    Che? Is that you?
     
  10. glaucon tending tangentially Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Hey. Let's not sully Che's good name by making such a comparison.


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    i think, in this particular case, he was a mod before the forum was sold.
     
  12. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    Look at how they stick together. One step in the right direction is to get rid of the moderator forum or better yet have it read only except for administrators.
     
  13. glaucon tending tangentially Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Holy.
    Forget to take your meds again of what?

    Calm down; it's an online forum, not your life.
    Although, if it is your life, perhaps it's time for some introspection.
     
  14. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    To be honest, tiassa is the only mod who is completely wrong for the forum they are modding. He would be ok in Art and Culture.
     
  15. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    hmmm, i am very calm. cant someone have an opinion?

    lets see the title of the thread is what?
     
  16. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    No reason to strong arm me gloucon.
     
  17. glaucon tending tangentially Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    I didn't, nor could I.

    There's a difference between having an opinion and ranting incessantly.
     
  18. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Don't ask me why, but the first thing I thought about when I read that was Eddie Murphy screaming "Police brutality!!.. Police brutality!!!!"..

    /Amused
     
  19. copernicus66 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    639
    Comandante Monistario? Is that you?
     
  20. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    i didnt think your comment was fair. i am not ranting here.

    took me a few minutes to realize where that was from. eddie is one of my all time favorites.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. madanthonywayne Morning in America Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,461
    Why?
     
  22. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    I find the moderation here rather acceptable, of course flawed personally as moderators usually are: most moderators do it for the power trip, and getting a power trip off of moderatoring a internet forum is a level of pathetic that has never existed before! Besides that point though they function well enough from my perspective, I've seen far more power triping waste of oxygen on some forums and complete anarchy on others, and sciforums has a health liberal (or lax) feel in between. I this is coming from someone who troll far and wide across the Internets, from the fascist totalitarianism of the nasa rejects of unmannedspaceflight.com to the pedophile and furry orgies of 7chan.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2009
  23. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    There is a consistent bias in the religion forum which is studiously ignored by mods and admin alike. Posts defaming Muslims have only now, after constant complaints started receiving any attention at all and only if they are reported. In any case, no matter how hateful the posts against Muslims are I have never once seen one that was deleted simply for being hate speech or even off topic.

    But a post on a response by a saudi blogger to the fitna movie giving the link of a video made in response to Fitna is conveniently termed as offtopic and deleted. Even after reports and complaints hate speech generalizing against all Muslims in the thread is also conveniently ignored. Apparently one cannot have too much discussion about the "evil" Muslims but any mention of a rational response is off topic and will be summarily deleted the moderator of the Religion forum himself encourages ragging of theist members and continues to openly flame and insult posters while deleting any opinions about his opinions made in the same thread.

    This is an obvious abuse of moderator power and again, complaints are overlooked or given platitudinous responses by admin.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page