Parachutes on planes.

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by TheFrogger, Dec 17, 2018.

  1. TheFrogger Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    Hi there.

    I was told about an idea to fit planes with parachutes in case of emergencies. How possible is this? I think it's a good idea.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,446
    Bad idea.

    I recently did a study of air disasters. Of the thousands of crashes/fatalities over the decades, exactly one (JAL 123) would have benefited from having parachutes on board. And even then, survival would have been doubtful for the people using them. In fact, the presence of them may well inspire people towards fatal misadventures - increasing the fatality rate.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. TheFrogger Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    No. Parachutes for the plane! ☺
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,446
    Ah. They have those: (although mainly for light/medium aircraft)

    https://brsaerospace.com/
     
  8. TheFrogger Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    Billvon, do you know why commercial jets don't already have them??
     
  9. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,347
    A 777-300 weighs ~343,300 lbs, not including passengers and luggage. Traveling at several hundred mph. If the engines just quit it would still be going very, very fast. Just straight down.
     
  10. TheFrogger Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    Emergency reserve engines??
     
  11. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,988
    This is incredibly silly. Commercial aviation is already extremely safe, compared to all the risks we accept, daily, in our lives.

    If one makes a list of the things to be done to improve the safety of our lives, this must rank at or near the bottom.
     
  12. TheFrogger Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    Hi. I still think parachutes are a good idea.
     
  13. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,347
    The heaviest known object that was soft-landed by parachute was a Minuteman missile, at 86,000 lbs (39,000 kg.). That's about a quarter of the weight of a 777 with no people or luggage aboard.
     
  14. TheFrogger Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    Okay. Thanks for the reply.
     
  15. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,446
    Because:

    1) The complexities of decelerating a million pound plane from 550 miles per hour safely without destroying the aircraft or pulping the people inside are formidable.
    2) Even if you could do that, the challenge of designing a parachute that could soft-land an aircraft like that are equally daunting.
    3) It is likely that the weight of that parachute would cause tradeoffs that would make aircraft even more dangerous (i.e. have to carry less fuel, have to reduce design margins.)
    4) In most cases a parachute would not help. There are very, very few airliner accidents where pilots both knew that the situation was unrecoverable and decided that at a sufficient height to use a parachute (i.e. >3000 feet or so.)
     
  16. Doug_Nightmare Registered Member

    Messages:
    2
    Uh, no. Boeing 777 glide ratio is ~16:1. I believe ETOPS 180 qualified. That is why it is allowed to fly half-way around the world, much of it over water.
     
  17. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,347
    EVENTUALLY.
     

Share This Page