Since you don't understand your own references your posts are usually misinformed. Like your [non] analysis of Kevin Browns derivation. You are 'a crank', by my definition, because you argue from a soapbox of intellectual dishonesty. IE: you don't understand what you're complaining about. The comment you made that I reference in post #96 would be comical if it wasn't so pathetic. Once again: "What that means is this: in the room you're in, your ball doesn't fall down because the spacetime in that room is curved. That's what the equivalence principle tells us. So why does it fall down? Magic?" You said this to a PHD physicist. For me it's a 'big clue' that you're clueless about GR. You referencing the metric tensor is ridiculous since it's just for 'crank show and non-tell'. You're a nuisance. Some pretty knowledgeable people feel the need to correct your 'constant misinformation troll'. The good thing is everybody gets to read the PHD response.