One v. Multiple Supreme Gods - LG v. Cris

Cris:

It is impossible to will two contradictory things at once. This is equivalent to making a square-circle. Similarly, God is construed as a necessary being, thus as a necessity, to die would be impossible. AGain, square-circle.

It is admitted that no God of any sort can violate that which is necessary. No matter what power one has, the impossible is barred.

Omnipresence is either rooted in space or does not exist. God is said to be omnipresent, so we must assume for the sake of its argument that it is a valid trait.

It is a vacuous concept that cannot have foundation in what it is meant to be everywhere at once. If everywhere includes space, and space can only be filled with one thing at any given time, then God must encapsulate everything in space, but there cannot be another God ontop of him, or another God ontop of that God, or another God ontop of that God.

Illogically noting what "infinite" means.

If that God has omnipotence in the way Light Gigantic defines, then he could not choose to never use it, as it must be the cause of all things or it is not omnipotence.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Superluminal said it differently, but I would say to exercise control.

William S. Burroughs put it like this, "If control is absolute, then why does control need to control?".

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.