OK, so who else is *** with Sam, ...

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by phlogistician, Mar 23, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342
    ... think she is dishonest, untrustworthy, and not fit to be a moderator?
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Repo Man Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,955
    It really has gone too far. If she were not a moderator, I would put her on ignore, and never respond to her again.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    She does tend to be a bit dictatorial doesn't she.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    Hmm because I am treating atheists as Dawkins treats theists?

    Are you saying theists cannot have a POV that is not the same as an athiest?

    If they do, they should not be allowed to be <insert position of authority>?

    Is this an example of the utopia we are aiming for?
     
  8. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    Meh, just don't read the relig subforum, it will save you from a lot of grief.
    Let them boil in their own soup.

    As for other subforums, I too miss the option of putting SAM in my ignore list.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2008
  9. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    Is that how athiests deal with opposing views?

    By pretending they don't exist?
     
  10. Exhumed Self ******. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,373
    Dishonest? Not that I've ever seen. Untrustworthy... In the first place, what do you need to trust her with? Fit to be a moderator? She does a good job in her subforums, as far as I'm concerned.
     
  11. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    It's just an epic waste of time that can be spent in more productive activities.
     
  12. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    I agree, if they did not target, misrepresent or demonise my beliefs, I would not care about theirs.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    people it's not S.A.M who is at fault here, but phlogistician who is on this forum to incite hatred.
     
  14. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    I disagree, little weasel. You're constantly lying about phlogistician, and been proven wrong. Don't take your personal grudge into this.
     
  15. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    yeah well grrr...
     
  16. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    Can't really blame them, most Muslims are still living in the Middle ages, their civilization has frozen in the 12th century. Other civilizations suffer because of that.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    does that make Amish in USA a potential for trouble in the future?
     
  18. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    Amish are not militant.
     
  19. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    Yeah, no one likes being denigrated. Hence this thread.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    And communism killed far more people than any Muslims ever said they would.

    Even today, the wars are western armies in Muslim states. Not the other way around.

    I would say the Muslim states also suffer from other civilisations constantly bombing them.
     
  20. Repo Man Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,955
    No matter how many times you are corrected, you insist on drawing a false equivalence between theists and atheists. You seem to be an intelligent enough person to understand the correction, so that's where the dishonest part comes in.

    If you will not agree to certain terms at the outset of a discussion, it becomes a version of Monty Python's The Argument Sketch.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!




    Look in the archives for Cool Skill's (AKA Lixluke) threads about atheists to see how not to have a debate. Yours are beginning to rival his.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2008
  21. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    If there is anyone who is being dishonest, untrustworhy and such that is you and you by far.
     
  22. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,822
    I'm entitled to my opinion. From where I see it atheism is a club of people who believe there is no God (as vs agnostics who claim to have no evidence either way and say I don't know).

    When I do an immunoblot I also add a control, to show something is really there. And have to show an absence of a band to claim it isn't

    The rest is semantics.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2008
  23. Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    Their spelling is very good.
    Better than most protesters.

    The worst spellers are the anti-paedophile protesters.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page