Oil Reserves in the U.S. Upped

Discussion in 'World Events' started by Buffalo Roam, May 8, 2008.

  1. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Kadark Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,724
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Syzygys As a mother, I am telling you Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,671
    At least we drew OIS and BR to the same thread, so they are not going to spread unscience in the rest of Sciforums. I don't know what's harder trying to explain to these guys simple things or debating religious people...

    No shit, shot...

    Very simple, let's start with a fairy tale. Once upon a time in Pennsylvania...

    ...anyway, in short, obviously 150 years ago there were lots of reserves that they didn't know about. As the world kept using oil, they needed to keep discovering newer and newer reserves, which they did. But the new discoveries were smaller and smaller and they were in harder to reach places and worse quality oil. The end....
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    From the graphs it easy to see the oil production has loss it growth rate seen in the decade before, now oil has a far more marginal or level out growth rate, yet demand has continue going up causing todays record breaking prices. I think it would be best to simply see what happens, will oil production go back to matching demand, will continue to level off or grow at marginal rates, or will it fall off.
     
  8. Syzygys As a mother, I am telling you Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,671
    With you? Seriously, no. You are a worse version of BR, using pretty much exactly the same and stupid arguments. Debate is unnecessery after your president, the OPEC and a few oil executives ALL acknowledged the fact of peak oil.

    CASE FUCKING CLOSED!

    And yes, I am very openminded, although I don't believe one can convince religious people or peak oil deniers....
     
  9. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
  10. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    Amazing how that works. Guess what? 150 years from now people will be saying the exact same thing.

    Amazing how that works isn't it?

    What planet do you live on? The discoveries keep getting bigger and bigger.

    http://peakoildebunked.blogspot.com/2006/03/263-are-largest-fields-discovered.html

    Let me guess: Matt Simmons taught you that LOL.
     
  11. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    If production ever peaks, and I doubt it ever will, it will be due to above ground political and technological factors and not geological factors.
     
  12. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    According to your source it says 85.9 with 85.7 being the 2 month average. It also says monthly data is often preliminary, and they give a source for historical values:
    http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/ipsr/t44.xls

    2006 average: 84.598
    2007 average: 84.594

    The Oil Drum.com is using the same source anyway, the EIA. The only rise was in Natural Gas Plant Liquids, whatever that is.


    A second and equally serious issue lies in the energy density of the new liquids being produced. In energy terms, 1 barrel of ethanol or a barrel of liquefied natural gas is not the same as a barrel of crude oil. The latter contains significantly more energy. Hence measuring energy production by the volumes produced (barrels) is misleading and presents an over-optimistic picture.

    In summary, the picture of rising liquids volume production up top is deceptive. With the passage of time the energy content of those liquids is falling steadily and the amount of energy used to produce them is rising. This means less energy for society to use at a higher cost.​
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2008
  13. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    Are you aware that 85.9 is a higher number than 84.6?
     
  14. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    They must not be counting natural gas. In any case the number you cited was incorrect.
     
  15. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    I thought we were talking about crude oil not natural gas.

    ???
     
  16. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Ah, they don't include 2008, since by the EIA's own admission, current numbers may be preliminary estimates.
     
  17. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    The February 2008 number isn't current or an estimate. It's the past and it's the actual production number which is why it was included.
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2008
  18. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931

    More good news in the E&P................

    The Kitchen's are open for exploration...........

    and

     
  19. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    This is all entirely expected given the high demand and high price of oil. It doesn't change the game in any significant way.
     
  20. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    I'm glade you consider it only a game, that is the problem with far to many liberals, they consider everything a game, and the game is crooked.

    The fact is that a new source of oil is open to exploration.

    80 % of the Federal Lands are not open to exploration or drilling, even though there is evidence that there is large amounts of oil to be found.

    The really sad thing is it is congress who through their short sighted energy policies that has put us in this situation.

    It isn't that they don't know about these sources, or that they haven't done any thing about them, it is that they consciously vote to not even explore those resources, and utilize them.

    Congress, refuses to let energy flow into the market, and is strangling the economy with their short sighted view, as engendered by the radical environmentalist, and enforced by the Left in Congress, with the help of RHINO's in the Republican Party.
     
  21. Giambattista sssssssssssssssssssssssss sssss Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,878
    Oil is going to peak yesterday.

    Oil is peaking, five years from now.

    Woops!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Oil jussst peaked a minute ago.

    No. It's going to peak tomorrow. Honest.

    No. It's going to peak 2010. Really, I swear...

    Why else would oil be up several hundred percent in 5 years? It's obviously peaking now. I mean, it's the ANTICIPATION for the peak. We knew this was gonna happen. You oil-addicts are just sooo spoiled. Now you get what you deserve. Heee heee. I hope the whole world bleeds.

    Sorry. Just had to do that.

    Don't know much about this topic, but I don't exactly believe that oil is suddenly sooo extremely scarce in roughly half a decade. Sounds like a tall tale. Actually, sounds extremely contrived.

    Happy hunger,

    T.H.R.U.S.H.
     
  22. Giambattista sssssssssssssssssssssssss sssss Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,878
  23. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    The liberals have only been in power in the Congress for two years. What are we going to do when those expensive sources also deplete? You cornucopians don't have any foresight. What are you going to tell your children when we have raped all federal lands for some temporary gain?
     

Share This Page