OG proposal #1 (June 09) - Cull worthless members?

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by James R, Jun 16, 2009.

?

Should we go ahead and remove useless members?

Poll closed Jun 23, 2009.
  1. Yes.

    10 vote(s)
    38.5%
  2. No.

    9 vote(s)
    34.6%
  3. Abstain.

    7 vote(s)
    26.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. StrangerInAStrangeLand SubQuantum Mechanic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,380
    -=-

    WHO truly believes you got an alien to sell???
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,019
    i got connections with the local hardware store. ( its a joke people)
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. StrangerInAStrangeLand SubQuantum Mechanic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,380
    -=-

    It flew over your head.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Cellar_Door Whose Worth's unknown Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,310
    I vote ripleofdeath and cluelusshusband. I think most other members would agree and I fail to see why they haven't been culled already. Although you could argue that ripleofdeath adds some entertainment value to the site, his constant preaching to me about how I am going to die painfully and alone is starting to get a little tiresome

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,903
    oK a joke is a joke but i thank thats 3 voats for me... 2 mor an i coud be baned.!!!

    PS
    This is proof that somtimes a joke can go to far.!!! :grumble:
     
  9. Mrs.Lucysnow Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,879
    The complaining lot.
     
  10. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,639
    The poll is closed.

    It looks like members are divided as to whether anybody here is "useless" enough to deserve a ban. Nevertheless, we have a narrow vote in favour of banning people.

    As stated in the opening post, 5 nominations were needed for any member to be put up for a ban vote.

    Looking through the thread, 8 members have been named as candidates for banning. Lou Natic, as you would expect, has also suggested that all moderators (or at least administrators) be removed as useless members.

    The greatest number of people mentioning any particular poster, however, is three, which is not enough for anybody to be put up for a formal banning vote according to the current proposal.

    This proposal is therefore now closed.

    I thank the membership for a useful discussion of the issue.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page