Off-topic personal nonsense split from Simple geometric proof GR's GW's are impossible

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by paddoboy, Jul 7, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,293
    I know I said last my words and you lure me out with sweet talk.
    You boys in the angry club all cant stand Paddoboy because he pulls you up in your claims you have the key to laying GR low. And of course you get angry with anyone who wakes you from your delutional dreaming.
    You want to get respect try giving some you want to throw mud expect to get some it return.

    On a serious note you have the benefit of input from a real physisist he has made valuable observations do you intend to dismiss him as well.
    The God will come crawling back in an hour or so maybe you him and Eddy can have a rage party.
    Alex
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,605
    If you claim to make a last word, stick to it. Your judgements I find bizarre, but hell each to their own.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,293
    I can change my mind so what.
    My last word is get on with proving wharever it is you think you are proving my judgements dont enter into the mix but you can call them whatever you like but doing so has nothing to do with science and the only judgements being made is upon your anger and inability to prove something any thing... You started off sounding reasonable yet you break into a rage for no reason. I was respectful to you but you just had to have a shot and I am not sure why...
    Alex
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,605
    More bizarre commentary. You want to keep going tit for tat in Sciforums tradition? Please answer by not answering - that will be a good answer.
     
  8. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,293
    No you hang up first.
    Alex
     
  9. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Its my experienced suggestion to you to please keep, Xelasnave at some distance. One somehow ends up loosing patience with him, I exposed him and then lost patience, Expletive Deleted also lost the patience and now you are at the verge. It is rightly seen by you that he has no technical ability to make a point..
     
    Q-reeus likes this.
  10. Farsight Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,475
    Q-reeus : utmost commiserations. You attempt to start a serous discussion about a physics issue, but you don't get very far. I can only apologise on behalf of physics to you.
     
    Q-reeus likes this.
  11. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,293
    You exposed yourself. Expletive Deleted exposed himself and you all have no ability otherwise you would present it. You are all talk but unfortunately no real science. You are all the same.
    Chest beaters. I upset you because I dont allow your nonesence. Anger and bullying is not science.
    Anyway I will step aside so you all can pull your self together and elect a speaker so go for it if you talk science I wont say a word keep insulting and I will report you.
    Thats the best deal you will get from me.
    Just remember all of you I wont stand for your bullying or arrogance.
    Stop pretending all of you I will go so you can rage to your hearts content.
    I am sick of all of you.
    Alex
     
  12. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Well that's certainly head and shoulders above being a clone of expletive deleted and/or the god. Or do you also have a closeted religious agenda?
    One can only wonder!
    Again despite your rather fabricated provocative headline re GW's and GR, they remain as confirmed as ever, and as detailed in more than a dozen papers in the appropriate threads.
    It will certainly take more than the fabricated diatribe from a few god botherers on a remote science forum, to invalidate.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    Three points:
    [1]Your simple proofs to invalidate GR GW's is non existent.
    [2] No invalidation will come about or be birthed on a forum such as this open to any and all.
    [3] Despite the conspiracies you dabble in with regards to your claim of mainstream GR, and its "god like status" the discipline of science is self correcting, and no conspiracy would be given any chance of maturity at all, simply due to the nature of the beast, and the fact that anyone that could present something concrete and substantial to invalidate accepted models, would be inline for the Nobel.
    As upsetting as that apparently is for you, it's also a fact of life.
     
  14. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,605
    Three worthless points, mere assertions empty of any objective and useful technical content. All you are capable of, as everyone except your close side-kick realizes.
     
  15. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,293
    It is a pity you failed to take advice as to how to be respectful otherwise you could have enjoyed the input of a real physicist but as I suggested when you just beat your chest these people just walk away, which no doubt suits you because that way you certainly wont have many left who could help you.
    Anyways you are doing well with those left and I must say your manners are somewhat better.
    It is a pity that we lost someone who knows what he is talking about.
    Alex
     
  16. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,293
    Well the fact is old chap those who realise what is going on simply move on.
    Its a pity that you fail to realise such. And so all you will be left with are folk who play with you knowing that those who have given up on you are having a good laugh at your expence.

    Alex
     
  17. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,605
    Typical of your input - oblique. Not once, in the many times you repeated the false accusations of 'arrogance' and 'bluster', were there specific references. No quotes by which the validity or otherwise could be reasonably judged. Hell I couldn't even figure if the 'arrogant' or 'bluster' was referring specifically to the content of #1, or subsequent interactions with my harsh and subjectively motivated critics here, or both. Learn to be sharp and specific. Some chance then of being taken seriously by anyone but paddoby.
    [your #41 not worth any serious comment.]
     
  18. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    Why? Because you say so?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Not good enough my friend.
    GR and GW's stand as unchallenged, and that is the only fact with regards to this thread that matters.
     
  19. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,293
    Really is that your best shot.
    You cause a knowledgeable member to withdraw his input and you dont see the problem.
    I suppose even if you have nothing to say you will certainly say it.
    Anyways I have been thinking you dont want to waste your time with the folk here when you are obviously ready to take down those mainstreamers at Cosmoquest.
    Have you been there? Do you think they will understand what we apparently do not.
    And linking me to Paddoboy is nice of you. I take it as a compliment you and the rage team obviously see him as top gun, so you have yet to give me a good insult I can report.
    Seriously settle down I dont want to play silly games but if you insist I will.
    My point was you could have been polite and we would not have lost a worthwhile contributor.
    Alex
     
  20. river

    Messages:
    9,793
    GR has been challenged many times .
     
  21. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,647
    Yes, poor choice of words by me...It is of course continually challenged as are most scientific theories, but as of this date, all challenges fail.
    That's science...that's how science works.
     
  22. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,605
    But you obviously are playing silly games. Never addressed the specifics of my criticism; again illustrating the nebulous, and actually hugely ironic nature of your postings. This thread is supposed to be about intelligently discussing the specifics of my OP claim. Admit you cannot do so, and then take the hint finally and desist from further useless polemic that just clutters and wastes everyone's time.
     
  23. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,293
    You were asked for some math and you presented beads.
    Not real science or are they special science beads. Try an abacus it has beads.
    Anyone capable probably wont bother trying to talk to you.
    Anyway I will leave your thread so you can get on with the science.
    Alex
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page