Off-topic personal nonsense split from Simple geometric proof GR's GW's are impossible

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by paddoboy, Jul 7, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    • Please do not troll. Post on-topic and do not insult other members.
    Moderator note: This thread has been split from here:

    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/simple-geometric-proof-grs-gws-are-impossible.157012/

    ---


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    And yet you continue to peddle your anti GR unsupported stuff here and avoid a proper paper and peer review.
    Seems like I've woken up a pussy cat!
    Night q-reeus, I need my beauty sleep!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 11, 2016
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    Quaint. And a useless first reply just as predicted here: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/a-...t-it-wrong-with-gr.156996/page-5#post-3391317
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    Your predictions so far count for nil.
    Your links do not challenge or invalidate GR or GW in anyway, and most certainly any future challenge to GR will not be through you, but through proper channels. You can bet your short n curlies on that fact.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    Worthless bluster.
     
  8. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    More worthless bluster - as substitute for dealing with the substance of my presentation. We all know you are incapable of such a feat.
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    No fact my friend. The worthless bluster is what you somehow imagine from the OP.
    GR, gravitational waves and BH's are even more confirmed then 12 months ago.
     
  10. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    They will find what they want to find , the mainstream ; they need to ; truth is irrelevant to the mainstream; just continue on the BS.
     
  11. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    You seem to forget river, that if you or anyone else had anything concrete invalidating GR or any part of it, you would not be here.
    These forum's are a haven for nutbags that will continue to try to rip down GR and Einstein. They have been doing it for a 100 years and yet still languish in obscurity.
    If and when GR is modified, if and when we have a validated QGT, it will certainly be the work of mainstream recognised professionals: Not by any handful of bums that frequent a science forum to fabricate there nonsensical objections.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    But none of that interests you, because the forum knows you are simply trolling.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    Stick to GR variety (and similar theories) GW's - that's the OP topic. So where is your detailed rebuttal? Well you could never manage such. But how about this time working up enough courage to email your fav GR Profs and see what any of them have to offer. That might be useful and interesting.
     
  13. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    Only pointless chaff throwing from riffraff here at SF? Anybody here with more than an ounce of nous and balls up to challenging me on the substance of #1? ANYONE?!
     
  14. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,919
    • Please post on-topic.
    Yes I challenge your arrogant manner. I certainly do not know enough to present a case.
    But if you do have a case or anyone else does I feel proceeding on a polite manner with proofs would be all it takes to make ones point.
    Personally I am always suspicious when someone uses bluster in place of well set out argument.
    And if you present your position with bluster bordering upon anger and rage it is most likely that those who could probably engage you in discussion will avoid doing so as they would be thinking you have a position that you will not surrender even if given useful input.
    Speak your truth clearly and quietly jaming it down someone's throat will only cause them to throw up.
    I am interested in what you have to present but when you get upset I lose interest and I expect many others would feel the same.
    Usually I just keep walking but you asked and I answered.
    Alex
     
  15. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    Amazing. Instead of recognizing the utter unreasonableness and bluster coming from my critics - worthy only of contempt for so badly misrepresenting and denigrating my position - you join in!!
    As for answering me - I did specify "anyone with more than an ounce of nous...". You may have the balls part, but be honest, you have zero technical competency to judge anything presented in #1. Even though it is simply presented, basic, watertight logic. Why should I not come across as confident when I know there is no hope of an objective counterargument?
    False humility and timidity is not part of my makeup. Sorry if that offends, but that's how it is.
     
  16. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    Don't be so foolish. Your bullying has no effect on me sonny.
    I E-Mail professionals when I see fit. Not when you see fit to demand of me.
    And as I said before, whether I am able to refute the OP, or anyone else for that matter here, does not mean that it cannot be done.
    We have limited professionals here, and if you had the intestinal fortitude [or as you suggest in your total arrogance, the balls] you would write up your own presentation/paper for professional peer review.
    You and any other anti GR novice, will not invalidate GR,GW's or BH's on this forum...you know that, I know that, and the forum knows that, not withstanding your blustering bullying arrogant attitude.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    See above my eunuch friend.
     
  17. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    Reported for that last insolent insult. As for having it published, that will likely happen as a co-authored piece in due time. In the mean time, stop trying to tell me I have no right to present it here first as I see fit!
     
  18. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    Reported for such outlandish insults to the forum as a whole.
     
  19. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    And likewise your own childish arrogant inference reported.
    And I'm not telling you not to present it here first.....I'm telling you to undergo proper peer review for the reasons stated.
    When you get it published, if you get it published, and if it is accepted, and if it is taken up as "theory", then my friend you can come here and claim what you like. I won't hold my breath though.
     
  20. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    And neither mine. So the message is, if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen...If you want to throw insults and barbs at other people, personally or collectively, don't cry like a baby when it is thrown back at you.
    What were you saying about a 7 year old?.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    Badly out as usual. My comment was in context obviously not directed at the forum as a whole, but to you and PhysBang - who between you have contributed nothing of positive value to this thread.
    Good as telling me. By being the actual number one troll. Endlessly raking up past issues and such like, and baselessly ridiculing my choice to present here. Why the hell not - what do you think forums are for?
     
  22. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,919
    Join in, I hardly think so, I thought I was being polite and standing away from anyone ready to be harse on you. Nevertheless I suspect you feel victimized and I am just another detractor in the mob.

    As for your diagram and my ability to understand what you mean my only suggestion is perhaps you are over simplifying the geometry.

    I doubt your ability to understand the methodology if indeed you have reviewed it. Over simplification may be a problem.

    But you make the point I was trying to make you aware of...Your arrogance and bluster leaves me thinking you have nothing to offer such that I should seriously look into the matter. So your bluster is sort of working with me because I am not going to point anything out that I may think relevant and strangely I have spent some time considering this matter and so I was interested to follow what you say and more importantly how others would answer you.

    I doubt you will get anything meaningful for the reasons I said above.

    Your arrogance is common to folk who usually don't know as much as they would have one believe.

    If you had anything you would not be here for a start.

    I spend a lot of time at Cosmoquest I bet they would eat you for breakfast so if you think you are clever why waste time with a mug like me and put your coin on the table at Cosmoquest...just asking and please don't get mad because I have the decency to point out what others are thinking but won't reply to your bluster.

    Your arrogant attitude let's you down. If you are as good as you make out you don't need to be that way.

    Best wishes knock yourself out on a reply but I have given you my last words.

    Alex
     
  23. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,497
    expletives deleted was right about you to this extent - basically a somewhat more genteel clone of paddoboy.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page