It is becoming increasingly and increasingly obvious that you do not read our exchanges. You look for buzzwords and phrases and then react. Just what the hell are you talking about? This is a bunch of disconnected jibberish. Its called reading comprehension joe. I am sure your local university has a course you can take. Go ahead and accuse me again joe, you don't read what is written and complain about it being jibberish. It's an either/or situation. Either you cannot read, or you are being deliberately obtuse so as to instigate your opposition into getting off target. If the second, then again I don't why mods allow you to get away with it. I frankly think it is the second. Cuz that's what you do when you have been hammered. A couple of things, one you sources are fine. But SO? What is your point or do you have one? They all point out that Healthcare Reform Law passed last year was enacted by normal congressional legislative process and not "fiat" as you claimed. The idea here is that you are supposed to support your claim, not mine. I explained my point and then some. Again joe, stop playing stupid. Additionally, it was not passed by normal procedure and only an obama freak would say that. Let me guess, I am a racist because I think obama doesn't act constitutionally? What are you talking about? If you are trying to say that no where in the Constitution does it give the Congress the explicit authority to enact the healthcare reform law passed last year. Then I would ask you the same thing I have asked buffalo roam and for which he has never answered and it is this; Playing stupid again joe! I wrote that clause because it didn't pass through by normal procedures. It was passed by the house and the executive branch, but not the senate before it become law. Again, I cannot wait until this happens on the flipside, because you will cry to high heaven how unconstitutional it is. Where in the US Constitution does it say Congress can create an Air Force? Clever example of the Constitution not being in line with the times, but unfortunately you will use that logic for everything including that which is specifically enumerated. The Constitution does give Congress the power to regulate commerce and healthcare is commerce. This is true. However, regulate is not the same as takeover. Additionally, you have been asked several to state where it does say this? You still have not answered the question. Don't look now but you just contradicted yourself. Your memory appears to be fading fast. I looked forwards and backwards and guess what? You lied. I didn't contradict myself. You clearly inferred something that I never implied. Stop lying joe! LOL, go back to those personal attacks. Where's the personal attack joe? Hmmm? Tell me?
You really wrote this as an intellectual response to whom? Socialists? Sorry but I never have nor will subscribe to the socialist b.s.!!
LOL, you remind me of the pot and kettle story. My dear mr. galt I have college degrees, and I did not get them by not being able to read. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Nice excuse, but your rants do not make sense...its called jibberish. I suggest you take some writting lessons and learn to express your thoughts more clearly. Name calling is no subsitute for reasoning and fact based discourse my dear mr. galt. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I guarantee if the Republicans get in charge again, we will see nothing but investigations and impeachments, because you know there isn't any other pressing business to attend to but hunting your political enemies.
Well if that were the case, it should be hard for you to point out the post where you claim to have done so. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! But the fact is you have not, so you cannot. This has nothing to do with my "world view". It has everything to do with your inability to recognized and deal with the inconsistencies in your positions. Still waiting. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! HUH? A little disconnected thinking going on here. OH, prove it. I have proven to you that you did in fact lie, and I did so by going back and using your own words to prove that you indeed did lie. Further I not only posted the text, but the post numbers as well. The bottom line mr. galt is that you did indeed lie and you further lie by denying that you did indeed lie. This gets back to my position that you cannot address the many inconsistencies in your positions. Where is your proof? You partial answer was in giving your definition of the word "statism" which happens to be different from the common accepted definition of the word. Two, where is the thread number where you gave the explanation and justification of your claim that the heatlhcare law (Obamacare) was passed by "fiat"? Where is your proof that Obamacare was passed by fiat as you claim? Let me refresh your memory: Originally Posted by John T. Galt Finally a definition - Joepistole This proves my previous point. Where did I give a definition? I didn't and you somehow got it in your small mind that I did. Again, reading comprehension. - galt post #98 Statisim is about government control. Socialism is about government ownership. - john t. galt post #96 No mr. galt you are in slippery mode...trying to avoid justifying your many false claims. I again call on you to prove your claim that the healthcare reform law was passed by fiat. Show a post number that supports your claim with evidence.
This is your quote. Your definition. Yet, you keep claiming I wrote. This is your post not mine. Again you keep claiming things that aren't true. I have answered your questions and you refuse to accept it, because it doesn't fit your view. I have pointed out the whole Founding thing, Civil War, Fiat, and I have answered them all. In fact, I have asked you several question of which you have simply passed aside. Truly, it is I who am still waiting. Reread our exchanges after you take a reading comprehension class. You will understand that everything I am saying is true in terms of answering your questions and making certain comments (above) that I didn't say. I challenge you to reread the posts. You continue to ignore it just like your refusal to answer the questions I have asked.
Yes I did write that. Now where did I say that was your definition of soclialism? I think it was quite clear in that text that I was refering to your incorrect use of the word. Then prove it...show the links. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Then prove it, show the links. Show the links or answer the questions mr. galt. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Then why do you keep saying that I said it? And no joe it isn't quite clear that you were trying to say that I was incorrectly using the term. I know you are trying your best to goad me into saying something to get me banned, but it isn't going to happen. Reread the posts, I have your answered your questions already just reread the posts. While you are at, try to answer some of the questions you have been asked! I don't have to prove anything joe. I already did it. Reread our exchanges.
No you didn't, it is time to put up or shut up my friend. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Obama should be impeached for bowing before Islamic regimes and saying Israel is a result of the Holocaust. This is dis-historical and a genocide premise. In fact, the Holocaust was a result of a historical displacement factor. It is the Rgimes Obama bows to which are dis-historical.
Yes, I did. Reread the posts. It is time for you to do some proving if you are so damn confident I haven't then why don't you prove it. Prove it, joe! Prove I didn't answer the questions. Prove it!!!!!!!! Reread the posts
Don't look now, you are squirming. Show the links that support your claim. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
