NRA's Call to Violence

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Kittamaru, Jun 29, 2017.

  1. Kittamaru Suppose it makes sense. Wearing a bit thin. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,936


    At what point do we get to call these assholes out for being domestic terrorists and pushing to incite violence? They are following Hitlers propaganda tactics nearly perfectly... specifically the "Accuse the enemy of that which you are guilty" part.

    *shakes head* This is the kind of shit that makes rational folks start moving towards tougher gun laws... to try and keep guns out of the hands of these clowns!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. spidergoat Venued Serial Membership Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,204
    Oh noes, a window got broke, send out the national guard! Bunch of cowards.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. karenmansker HSIRI Banned

    Messages:
    638
    Inciting violence? . . . get real! . . . its more like REACTING TO violence. From my recollections (that would be IMO!), it seems that the rioters are the ones actually conducting violence and destruction and fomenting resistive (to what? I would enquire) ACTIONS. The video is suggesting to be prepared to counter that ACTUAL violence and destruction and be prepared for additional riotous activity. I have no problem determining the difference between OFFENSIVE action and DEFENSIVE action, or with defensive posturing as a countermeasure.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2017
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. spidergoat Venued Serial Membership Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,204
    What are you going to do, shoot a protestor? What is this, Venezuela? Or the USA in the 1960's?
     
  8. Kittamaru Suppose it makes sense. Wearing a bit thin. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,936
    Karenmansker, need I remind you:

    http://mashable.com/2016/03/12/trump-rally-incite-violence/#K1Jj_zN2Iiqw

    or how about

    https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000004269364/trump-and-violence.html

    Or how about his own words:
    Trump didn’t make clear what specific incident he was referring to. But during a rally in Las Vegas last month, Trump had this to say about a protester who was escorted away: “The guards are being very gentle with him… I’d like to punch him in the face, I’ll tell you that.” He added that the protester had been “throwing punches.”

    Then there's this gem:
    http://time.com/4203094/donald-trump-hecklers/

    "If you see somebody with a tomato, knock the crap out of them," Trump said, referencing another incident with a protestor.
    Trump said he would even pay for any legal fees that supporters incurred stopping a tomato-thrower. The theory was quickly put to the test when Trump spotted a protestor and had them removed.

    So sorry karen, but it's TRUMP and your Republican Cronies calling for violence.

    Next time, try a dose of REALITY before you insert your foot into your mouth.
     
  9. karenmansker HSIRI Banned

    Messages:
    638
    But it would appear (from even the liberal news media!) that it is the Liberal 'resistance folks' (Liberitards?) who ACTUALLY ARE rioting and destroying others' (and public) property.

    Need I remind YOU that it is also this 'resistance' crowd that is treasonously prosyletizing- via bloody choppedTtrump head displays (K. Griffin), assasination suggestions (J. Depp), blow-up the White House (Madonna), etc. - our duly-elected POTUS's failure/demise! The 2016 election is OVER . . . Democrats lost! . . . learn to live with our constitutional system of election of our leaders, as all our ancestors have for over 225 years!

    [BTW, Kittmaru: Need I also remind YOU of 1st Amendment rights of free-speech. If you so dislike my 1st Amendment opinions and are so disgusted by my 1st Amendment posts that may disagree with yours, go ahead and - as you so 'respectfully' (NOT) have done on another thread - "block" me on this thread also . . . hey . . . . its only abridging MY rights . . . whay would that matter? . . . maybe a perma-ban is your abuse of choice.]
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2017
  10. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,517
    Yeah I happen to remember quite a lot of disgusting talk after Obama was elect from the right, so the trump head thing, Depp's bad joke, Madonns quiff, I don't see a problem, that and 1st amendment.

    As for violent protesters and riots on the left, by all means go right in there and shoot them, lets see who comes out of that looking good, come on put your guns where your mouth is.
     
  11. Kittamaru Suppose it makes sense. Wearing a bit thin. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,936
    Need I remind you it is your conservative white supremacist fuckwits going about assaulting and physically abusing those not like them:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...gbt-hate-crime-wave-us-election-a7410166.html
    The list goes on and on...

    1) Trump is hardly "duly elected" - not only did he LOSE the popular vote (despite his insane proclamations that he had the largest margin ever), but the tampering with the election is rather blatant.
    2) The election is over? Odd, your conservative/republican friends seemed to have issues "learning to live with" our duly elected President Obama, and instead made spurious accusations that he was "Born in Kenya", burned effigies of him, hung effigies of him from trees, etc... but I guess it's all A-OK because it was happening to a black guy, right Karen? The depths of your depravity are disgusting.
    3) You may want to learn what the definition of "treason" is... because I don't know of ANYONE in the resist movement that is aiding a hostile government during a time of war...

    Perhaps next time you will avoid the drive-by-troll tactics that have seen you rack up EIGHTY infraction points, hm? Or has the lesson not sunk in yet (you do seem to be incredibly hard headed in that respect).

    It's funny, though - you bitch about things like the "severed head of Trump" thing, then claim YOUR filthy spew is covered by the first amendment... I wasn't aware you were uniquely qualified to determine who it is that gets constitutional rights, Karen.
     
  12. karenmansker HSIRI Banned

    Messages:
    638
    . . . . See what I mean, Bells and James R? Reported here and will cc to your conversation. KSM
     
  13. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,821
    Oh..

    Yeah..

    Ermm..

    Great..

    You, ermm, don't need to CC anything. We have the report I am sure we can follow it all from there.
     
  14. karenmansker HSIRI Banned

    Messages:
    638
    Bells and James R. . . .Thank you both! . . . .
     
  15. karenmansker HSIRI Banned

    Messages:
    638


    18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason


    § 2381.
    Treason
    Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    So, IMO, if folks want to renounce their citizenship (owing allegiance), or leave the country (can't levy war), or aid and comfort enemies (here, or there!) they might get away with what otherwise would be considered treason, OMO, of course!
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2017
  16. karenmansker HSIRI Banned

    Messages:
    638
    Bells and James R. . . . Thanks to you both!
     
  17. Kittamaru Suppose it makes sense. Wearing a bit thin. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,936
    Alrighty, now that that has been handled (Karen, I'm sure the fact that an administrator has weighed in and reinforced that what was said is justified), perhaps we can get back on topic... ie, the fact that we have an organization openly calling to use violent tactics against those who would utilize their constitutional right to protest and assembly...?
     
  18. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,517
    Greensboro massacre... not that I want to see that happen again, but it would flip opinions fast on who is worse if it was NRA vs antifa.
     
  19. Kittamaru Suppose it makes sense. Wearing a bit thin. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,936
    Aye, calls to random violence never end well. If this were a left-leaning group putting out a call to arms to march on the government, I have little doubt that it would be stamped out right quick (and possibly followed with a declaration of Marshall Law in the affected area(s)).

    Unfortunately, it seems we Americans are too daft to demand practical changes to policy without some polarizing force (9/11 comes to mind)
     
    ElectricFetus likes this.

Share This Page