No time to die but eventually die

Saint

Saint

Valued Senior Member
1. So this time James Bond dies?
2. Safin does not look like a bad guy, he always looks sad more than fierce.
3. Why Safin spared the little girl and let her walk away instead of killing her? He got compassion?
4. Why Bond did not want to jump into the sea before the missiles struck?
5. Why Moneypenny is a Black, she used to be a White lady sitting in the office, but now she came out and shoot. Does not make sense.
6. Why Paloma appeared for shooting scene only? And she did not sleep with Bond.
7. Who actually is the Bond's girl, Nomi, Paloma or Madeleine?
8. Felix used to be a white guy, but not this time, and he dies too.
 
Saint said:
3. Why Safin spared the little girl and let her walk away instead of killing her? He got compassion?
4. Why Bond did not want to jump into the sea before the missiles struck?
Click to expand...
I think you may have missed the basic plot of this movie.
 
SPOILERS WARNING

_

_

_

_

Saint said:
1. So this time James Bond dies?
Click to expand...

It was only the termination of Craig's particular rendition of Bond. The character template will return as Henry Cavil, or some other "in the running" actor.

4. Why Bond did not want to jump into the sea before the missiles struck?
Click to expand...

Bond was infected with Heracles, with respect to its assassination target being personalized for Madelein and his daughter. IOW, via remaining alive, he would have been a high risk to their survival.

5. Why Moneypenny is a Black, she used to be a White lady sitting in the office, but now she came out and shoot. Does not make sense.
Click to expand...

It's a European or guilty white male thing -- a patronizing, emotional facade of post-colonial remorse, often hiding more devious career empowerment tactics. Asia and other areas of the world shouldn't risk going bonkers trying to understand these sacred moral posturings of Church of Woke.

But that said... Color, sex, and age swapping of minor characters as voluntary acts on the part of film-runners is justified in these type contexts, where the franchise is limited to a set number of characters.

Other situations, however -- like tranzing Doctor Who "himself" rather than introducing a separate Lady Timelord series (his daughter, for instance), are deceptive, condescending matters. Revealing no actual confidence in new female and ethnic characters being able to break out and survive on their own. So they instead stand them on the shoulders of existing major characters and convert the latter. The pretentiousness and opportunism of a CulHeg conspiracy orientation-- appearing to be doing _X_ population group a favor, while also maintaining slash expressing denigration and exploitation on the sly.

8. Felix used to be a white guy, but not this time, and he dies too.
Click to expand...

His death was a harbinger of Bond's own demise.

Same situation as above with respect to other, but in the more justified context. Not endorsing the kind of diversity that is policy enforced by the administrations of institutions, but communities working out "multiculturalism" incrementally on their own without the ulterior motivations of a background ideology is fine (i.e., "natural" development, progress).
 
Last edited:
9. Why Safin wants to kill Blofeld through Bond? Had Safin replaced Blofeld as the Head of Spectre?
10. In "Licence to Kill", I thought Felix's legs were eaten by shark already. Why the role of Felix still exists until now?
 
11. Madeleine's father commit suicide in front of Bond in Spectre, had Mr. White killed the whole family of Safin? And Safin killed Madeleine's mother when she was a kid.
Why Mr White wanted to kill Safin's family?
12. Is Madeleine the first Bond's girl who appeared two times to Bond's series consecutively? I guess Léa Seydoux must have earned a lot of money by acting in 2 series of Bond and she is the key person in the story.
 
James Boind died long ago, when he was no more the dude tricking the enemies with his smart tactics. The first movie with Craigs as James Bond was the funeral of a legend. A funeral that has lasted a few more films. This last movie is just the official burial.

While the recent tendency to change the character of James Bond into a more human person, at the same time has degraded this character as a common and even vulgar individual. James Bond was to be always an idol, not a "person".

I also have watched this last movie where "Janice" Bond was introduced...

I love black women, but this fat black girl didn't convince me at all, because she is less than ordinary.

007 is not for a position for regular people, 007 means the best of the best, not so amateurs learning spionage skills in the field.

I don't feel sorry for the new generation who now are inheriting such a low class 007 rather than the knowing all spy, capable to be ahead from the most smart villains. I don't feel sorry for them because today in video games they have super heroes who play the fantasy way better than the traditional 007. The new generations don't need James Bond anymore.

From now on the number of the spy agent is ♀♀7
 
The next new James Bond will have completely new story and has no connection with previous Bond.
I like to see Bond's state-of -the art Aston Martin but this time NO, the car looks antique.
 
Why when the bad guys shot Bond, the bullets missed?
But when Bond shot them, the bullet hits?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top