New moderators for Free Thoughts and Art & Culture

nope.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Bentheman springs to mind.
A real physicist...

Pfft "enjoyable rational" is either a tautology or a contradiction.
If it's rational it gives satisfaction* = enjoyment.
On the other hand "enjoy" is an emotion and therefore irrational.

* Purely because it IS rational: C follows from B which follows from A...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

i didnt make post #121.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

which mods are on duty right NOW?

 

Sure, lol, you're not convincing anyone.

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I rest my case. See. This shouldn't be a way to moderate. I didn't say something confliciting your explanation. It's just my expression is not as pedant or as detailed as yours. You can't moderate scientifically. Emotions are not irrational! Vulnerability is a human quality!
You are having fun with me, aren't you? I don't know,lol. But you 'enjoy' this don't you, is that irrational?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

how do we know its John99 wrote made this post

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

what if its the game of moderator God.

 

Even if he did...he could simply delete it, no? So many weirdos..

 

Well.. I see you don't know John very well.. lol

 

Do you really think, you can get to know somebody by online posts no matter how much times passes?

 

Your case is tired?

I could try.

Of course they're irrational: they conflict with rationality so often, and interfere with making logical decisions.

Me have fun?
Pfft I don't know how.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I didn't make post #123.

 

remember to keep on topic. Or else...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I'll have you nailed

 

No, of course not. I meant as far as is possible on a forum.
It's easy to see patterns of behavior in a forum poster.

 

Enmos knows each member's posting frequency, he's got it all figured out. He cracked my shell, so to speak.

 

The major problem is the way that moderation is defined here, it is more "policing" than moderation, the emphasis is on the acceptable message that conforms to expectations of a certain point of view and to chastise and demean and remove those who do not or will not conform. The ideal moderator should simply guide the discussion so as to keep it civil and within a framework of concepts under discussion and not choose which viewpoint to endorse

 

Now, it's sad.

It's not even trial in error, is it?

So often. Hmm, is this out of experience of out of knowledge? What's the reccomended action by logic, discard them all?

Yes, you do. Too much sometimes that I observe.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Every time you type 'pfft', I feel an urge to slap a tongue stuck out,lol.

 

S.A.M is of course not talking about herself being unfairly moderated, most. def. not...she is carying for other folks out there, oppressed by mods actions. This has nothing to do with muslims and Jews.

 

Yep, I guess, you could say that. Out of curiosity, how many posts are required do you think to understand a member's pattern?

 

For the record, I meant that John has somewhat of a history claiming these sort of things.
And there are a number of posters that don't know how to delete their posts. When they double post by accident they will edit one of the posts and apologize for the double post.. :shrug:
Also, I was just messing with him initially. I don't know whether or not he or a mod posted that post.
Sigh..