Heh! It doesn't matter because he doesn't WANT any sense /facts to get in the way of his "thinking." Remember that in some of his very old posts he told us he was an exceptional genius who was schooled by a high-ranking member of the military. So our poor, weak ordinary minds aren't equipped to challenge his "knowledge."Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
http://www.gfy.ku.dk/~amir/papers/GRL2001.pdf accounts for seismic activity within moon and how they are using S-wave calculations to find lunar composition.
Rabon is vacationing on the Moon. He will reply when he comes back as the interplanetary network is not operational. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Well, let me start by giveing the values for ferrum(iron) in the compostion of the earth, as that is what so many ideas of earth interior are based on, The Ferrum(iron) content for the earth was 44,229,039 cubic miles, having a mean depth between 7 miles and 6.784 miles depth in the earth surface. 44,229,039 cubic miles is just under the area of earth surface that is above sea level. If you imagine the habital land mass of earth as soild ferrum to a depth of 1 miles, it would serve as a good representation of the earths Ferrum content. This representation of the earths habital suface as soild iron(ferrum) also serves as a model for the moons distribution of iron on its surface, Clementine Radar imageing of lunar iron content in lunar surface. Iron is a trace element on the earth and the moon, and its normal state, location of aggregate form in layer is in the surface of both bodies as a trace element. If I look at the deposit of ferrum on the moon at a given depth, it maybe that the iron content photographed by clementine, is actually 6.7 miles in depth from the normal planed surface, (where in the surface contour of the moon drops to 6.7 miles in depth exsposing the moons richer iron layer in the surface.) of silicon, or it may be that the iron detected by clementine is the entire conglomerate of the moons iron, the smooth surface of the region, does indicate a ineraction with another body, namely earth, it may be that the earths magnetic feild one interacted with the moon, collecting iron of the surface to this region and forming the contours of this region of the moon surface. (The Face one the moon). Also i must make a correction, the elements of the moon compostion corrected are below, starting with carbon as the center and and ending with silicon as the surface Carbon 440 miles thick Nitrogen 243 miles thick Oxygen 174 miles thick Florine 19 miles thick Neon 50 miles thick Sodium 22 miles thick Mg 14 miles thick Alumin. 83 miles thick Silicon 2.7 miles thick It would seem that the iron on the moon would be visable,detectable, or locatable given the iron content for the moon has a layer thickness of 1,188 Feet resting in the surface as normal state at a depth of 6.7 miles in lunar soil. In the newer assement of compostion, it appears that the center of the moon is, or the majority of th moon is a gaseous element,(liquid in normal state) where the gas protion of the moons interior comprises 926 miles of the radius of the moon. the non gas elements comprise only 121.7 miles of the moons radius. this appears to be a mere shell as the moon, this type of condition is suggestive of a early formation with the earth, having a slow seperation rate from the proto-earth. DwayneD.L.Rabon
He has no links or sources - no basis of any kind for all that junk. He's just making it up as he goes along. And NOTHING could be farther from the truth!
Should not the heavy elements be at the center due to the gravity when planets and Moons form? Except sometimes the volcanic activity can move items to the surface but not too much without some serious rotation of that globe? There is speculation that Earth's core could be Uranium. Something about a nuclear reactor that keeps earth core hot.
presence of uranium in Earth is a result of a supernova explosion that happened long ago before Earth was formed...uranium cant be made by nuclear fission process inside the Earth core, cause chain reaction want go. Earth's uranium is the supernova's remnant material. http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q4106.html
if remnant of supernova was fairly homogeneous to form the plants, should not we get heavy elements in all the large planets?
There is undoubtedly SOME uranium and other heavy elements down there. But iron/nickel is far more abundant in the universe (therefore, the earth) due to supernova nucleosnythesis. This is all, of course, theoretical, and based on actual observational data and calculations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_nucleosynthesis
Yep, but perhaps not concentrated like in the earth. It's possible those elements are simply mixed in with the metallic hydrogen core of Jupiter. The Sun also has it's share of heavy elements, but also likely mixed more evenly.
We're talking about a gas giant here - the formation of those is thought to have been considerably different from that of the inner rocky/metallic planets.
