New Book - The Primordial Language - Confirmation of the Divine Creator

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by Anita Meyer, Jan 26, 2010.

  1. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    So Moses was too stupid to know geometry? Isn't the fact that humans discovered these mathematical contructions proof that God was not required?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Crunchy Cat F-in' *meow* baby!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,423
    That's just it Anita. We all know your books assertions are simply not true. Spidergoat already demonstrated the books initial premises to be objectively incorrect (which invalidates it).

    This is a religion subforum on a science site and the "truth" that your book claims isn't truth at all. We know this, we can see it, and we're letting you know.

    By not correcting your assertions and instead re-iterating them as "truth", it crosses the line of ignorance to an outright intent to deceive.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2010
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    That is your most fundamental error: either you are deluding yourself about the extent of your "knowledge" (as evidenced by your comments on evolution and carbon dating for example) or you're trying to delude us.

    Oh yeah, I nearly forgot:
    Racial comments?
    Really?
    Such as?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Heidi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    1
    I had googled the book the primordial language by Anita Meyer and found her at this forum.

    I have had the privilege of reading this book. Let me tell you it is fantastic! It ROCKS!

    This book had put the Divinci code and the book by Richard Dawkins the God delusion to shame! If this isn’t a best seller very soon I will be really shocked.

    Never mind these trolls Anita, because that is what they are. You will run across such people that are very ignorant and belligerent and serve no use in the real conversation here or anywhere.

    I do have some questions for you though? Your book was so overwhelmingly powerful concerning Egypt and the Great Pyramid that I was just blown out of the water. Tell me, do you still think the Great Pyramid has that working ability?

    Thanks, Heidi L.
     
  8. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    More dishonesty Anita?
    Creating sockpuppets to support your view?
     
  9. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    That's what I thought, but the IP's don't match. I think it's probably a friend sticking up for her.
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Funny, I just reported that post because as far as I can tell the IPs DO match...
     
  11. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Heh.. You're right.
    I'll leave the honors to you

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    And here I thought lying was a sin. Silly me.

    I'm not trolling, I'm trying my best to point out the errors in reasoning and evidence in this book.

    You can't just assert that evolution has no proof, and then support that with incredulity about abiogenesis. At least show why the massive body of evidence supporting evolution by natural selection is wrong.
     
  13. Crunchy Cat F-in' *meow* baby!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,423
    I say just ban Anita. She has demonstrated an intent to decieve... not just by peddling her work of fiction as fact but also by creating sock puppets to agree with it.

    None of that belongs on a science site.
     
  14. Anita Meyer Banned Banned

    Messages:
    259
    I’d like to set the record straight here… I have been unjustly accused! I am not this poster. Did it ever occur to you that this IP address is registered to the Kenosha Wisconsin Public Library system. This is a PUBLIC PLACE that anybody can walk into and use the internet to post. This library is a huge place and pulls in many people.

    Hello guys… and my book is available there. I live in this town! So it would logically make sense that this person has my book. To accuse me of being a Sock Puppet (as you call it) is rather in lame standing as the rest of your name calling, racial comments, lame comebacks, and the mean act of deliberately attempting to sabotage me and my book.

    Here’s a little wake up call… its not happening!

    Good news for you guys though, I definitely will not be posting here anymore so good luck in your trolling endeavors. Anything said after this posting I will have no course of rebound. So spout away, since I know you will foolishly do so anyways.

    Happy trolling, Anita Meyer
     
  15. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Bye, Sweet Anita!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    :shh: Hey, I'm also a lapsed Jew, do you want to go out some time? (PM me). :mufc:
     
  16. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Not according to their catalogue.

    Same IP address, same (poor) grammar and sentence construction.

    You still haven't explained "racism".
     
  17. SnakeLord snakeystew.com Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,758
    Only one question for you:

    What's with: "G-d"

    Does whatever god it is you believe in kill a kitten everytime you dare include an 'o' or what?
     
  18. Blindman Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,425
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2010
  19. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    She did not make that up. It's a common imitation of the way Jews write YHWH in the Hebrew abjad without the diacritical marks for vowels. It is supposed to be the worst form of blasphemy to say God's name out loud. To prevent it they have never written the vowels, so no one knows how to pronounce it.

    An arbitrary set of three vowels has been adopted and these days it's usually written Yah'weh. Apparently those aren't the correct ones because God has not smashed the Earth into tiny fragments in one of his Celestial Tantrums. The Romans put in different vowels and used their own consonant symbols, transliterating it as Jehovah. Today we pronounce the J and the V differently so there's no chance we're saying it right.
     
  20. Anita Meyer Banned Banned

    Messages:
    259
    Hello Dyw...

    This is Author Anita Meyer. You had commented on the forum that my book was not available at the Kenosha Public Library. You said precisely that it was not available according to their catalogue.

    YES IT IS! And you (or anyone) can check it out to verify that!

    It was also for sale there "PRIOR" to it being entered into the Library system.



    Author Anita Meyer anitameyer1@hotmail.com
    Book - The Primordial Language - Confirmation of the Divine Creator
     
  21. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Anita, you posted this message on my Visitor's Board and sent me it TWICE as a PM.
    I will now give the same reply publicly since you seem not have read any of the ones I previously gave.
    ***
    With regard to your comment about the book being at the library: when I checked (half an hour or so before I posted my statement) the library's OWN catalogue did not list it. I was correct. If the library carries it NOW that isn't relevant.
    It also doesn't alter the fact that your book is a mish mash of errors, prejudice and flawed thinking: you failed to respond to any of the posts pointing out errors and simply plowed ahead reiterating your nonsense.
    ***

    Edit: I not also that you add one more lie to the list.
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2010
  22. Anita Meyer Banned Banned

    Messages:
    259
    I've noticed that you have selective reading.

    Note what I said: It was also for sale there "PRIOR" to it being entered into the Library system.

    Which means that it was available for people to read!

    You had unjustifiably banned an innocent person (Heidi) who had posted here!

    And quite frankly I am tired of you disclaiming that my book is a mish mash of errors, prejudice, flawed thinking and nonsense when you haven’t even read it.

    Confucius say: Man who throws dirt is loosing ground!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!





    Author Anita Meyer anitameyer1@hotmail.com
    The Primordial Language - Confirmation of the Divine Creator.
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    The selective reading is yours: I didn't retract my statement because it happened to be true. The book was not in the library's catalogue.

    And we have only your word for that.

    Heidi was trolling: she added nothing whatsoever to the thread. (And had some difficulty in comparing books: Da Vinci Code is fiction, Dawkins isn't). Personally I find it to be stretching coincidence when someone from your home town (purportedly) happens to appear in this thread to support you, a "someone" using the exact same computer that you do (out of how many possible in that building?).

    I've read the first chapter and your own claims (which have been shown to wrong). Please acquire some intellectual integrity.


    ***MOD NOTE***
    Although I'm not the mod of this sub-forum, unless you reply to the refutations already made (i.e. actually defend your case instead of making more unfounded claims), I will push for you to be banned also. You have been shown where and how you are wrong (Fraggle's exposition on the origins of Hebrew writing for example). I suggest that you pick ONE single point and stick to the defence of that: once that one is resolved (either way) then there may be some point in continuing. For example the title of the book is false: "Confirmation of the Divine Creator". How can the existence be confirmed when you have already admitted that god's existence is a circular argument with no other support?
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2010

Share This Page