Neutron Star to Black Hole

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by RajeshTrivedi, Jan 12, 2015.

  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225


    It actually appears you have decided to add confusion to your game to muddy the waters after your stuff has been mostlt derided.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Once you can get your senses around the fact that all an EH is is critically curved spacetime where the escape velocity equals "c" you may begin to understand.
    You may as well ask, how does the gravity get out of a BH?
    It's a fossil field, remnant from the original star from whence the BH formed.
    Likewise spin, within the EH, within the "static limit"and even to a lesser extent, outside the static limit, according to best accepted efforts.

    Sure I do, most certainly. Because most likely according to accepted GR theory that seems correct.
    And again your pompous pretense gets you nkow where.
    You do the googling sonny. Your the one claiming I and brucep is wrong. The onus is on you to show that.



    I said.......
    Let me make it quite clear. The Singularity region is at the Planck/Quantum scale...GOT IT? Can't make it any clearer.
    Otherwise with your confusing condascending posts, I seem to have lost you



    The aspect of who or who is not making a fool of themselves is open for all to see.
    Again, your pompous pretense in how you have put that, is way beyond me...congrats.
    Now drop the pretense and ask in more simple language and I'll answer to the best of my ability.


    "Singularity is at a much lower level than Plank/Quantum scale"....


    Professor Carlip did not say that. More porky pies?
    And if you like I can clog this thread up to with the other professors and many links that supported my view.



     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    Other's dont need an explanation'.
    You need the explanation, that a child may understand.
    Some questions you should answer...
    [1] Where does GR break down?
    [2]Where does quantum gravity take over?
    Please answer those questions.


    The Planck scale/level era/region [or whatever suits your fancy at this moment Rajesh] is a theoretical mathematical concept, that just happens to apply to th scale of where quantum gravity take over, and where GR fails, and where the Singularity begins.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    INTERPRETATION:
    I have no reference or link to this claim or any other claim I have made.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Where I come from, we call that a cop out.
    Perhaps in one of your many boring posts you can repeat it back to me? You do seem rather adapt at that.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,178
     
  8. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,178
    This concept of a neutron star in the first place is shear non-sense
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    Is it??
    Do you have any evidence at all to support that they do not exist, since science seems to have evidence that they do exist?
    Please answer the question properly, and not in your usual style of asking another question.
    Be upfront, be brave, tell us why you deem NS to be false and show us evidence supporting this belief.
     
  10. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,178
    The theory of the Universe is gravity based , in the mainstream
     
  11. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    The Universe on the whole is shaped by gravity, common knowledge, but doesn't answer the question I asked you.
    Please show some evidence invalidating the existence of Neutron stars/Pulsars.
    Please answer the question.
     
  12. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,178
    Thats interesting because , how does gravity , in and of its self , produce electrical energy ?
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    Stop your side tracking and have the intestinal fortitude to answer the question.
     
  14. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    One more thing of course. If you are going to use this as a vehicle to promote your silly discarded Electric/Plasma Universe, DONT!

    Start a thread if you like in the fringe section.
     
  15. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,178

    I don't find it my question at all , a side track

    How does gravity in and of its self produce electrical energy ?
     
  16. brucep Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,098
    The angular momentum is CONSERVED. It doesn't go anywhere else. So now you need to learn about conservation of angular momentum. If you don't want to learn any physics then quit asking clueless questions.
     
  17. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    You have a question to answer.....If you are able.
    If not just admit you were just mouthing off as usual.
     
  18. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    You going to back up your silly statement river, or are you a fraud?
    Are you going to answer the question?
    Let me try again.

    Do you have any evidence at all to support that they do not exist, since science seems to have evidence that they do exist?
    Please answer the question properly, and not in your usual style of asking another question.
    Be upfront, be brave, tell us why you deem NS to be false and show us evidence supporting this belief.
     
  19. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,178
    Anyway
    No

    But give me the facilities , the money and the best minds that Humanity now has , they will
     
  20. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    That's OK, Fraud!
     
  21. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225
    Yep, that's why they [mainstream] have the best minds.
    Jealousy of that fact is rather purile and childish.

    And this what certainly all you hangers on's , would be if you could be's, anti mainstream nutters, and conspiracy advocates should and must realise.
    Exactly what I have been saying. Live with it...you lot are behind the eight ball.
     
  22. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,366
    Question wrt Angular Momentum is a bit unclear from my side......Let me clarify........once beyond NS, the BH gets formed in transition, then the rotational KE of NS is hypothesized as associated with Ergosphere of Kerr BH, but the angular momentum can only be associated with mass and its spin thereof, this mass collapses to singularity and we do not know about its spin....so how do you account for this angular momentum ? Hope now the question is clear..
     
  23. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,225

    The whole Kerr metric rotates, and even beyond...just as spacetime rotates beyond Earth and its atmosphere. [SEE GP-B]
    That has been explained to you, why are you not accepting it?
     

Share This Page