Nasa Faked Moon Landing

>> What about the moon rocks, brought back and cracked open and studied?

The Russians have brought back moon rocks supposedly, and they have not put a man on the moon......

I am wondering, from the analysis of these 'moon rocks', if they really came from the Moon, their composition is 'as if from Earth'.

I really don't care if they went or not, but today is today, and the evidence is accumulating.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Talk about faking going into space, has anyone seen the british reality show that convinced a bunch of students that they were going to be space tourists? The funny thing is they currently think they are orbiting the Earth, yet they are all standing and walking around, apparently not aware that there is zero G in space. They are in a simulator that has a projection screen of the Earth.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes, well they probably have very little or no scientific knowledge. Laos I think the shows people persuaded them that the "ship" had an "artificial gravity generator".

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

As the Moon was possibly torn away from a primordial Earth, is that such a surprise?


http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/moonwhack_main_000901.html

 

>> Moon was possibly torn away from a primordial Earth ...

yes I agree, it was ejected from the Earth

So what is the proof that THEY went to the Moon, landed etc ??

none is there ?

 

me too

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

No.The soviets did not bring back any samples.

 

The best recorded event in human history and you claim there is no evidence

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

>> As the Moon was possibly torn away from a primordial Earth, is that such a surprise?>>

Found this...

http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s1531577.htm
>> The Moon's surface cooled and solidified to make its current grey and white face more than 4.5 billion years ago, say researchers who have applied new dating techniques to rocks brought back by Apollo astronauts.

This age puts the Moon's first solid rocks at about the same age Earth's first crust, bolstering the popular idea that both bodies formed crusts at about the same time .... >>

same age, same composition.... well that is reasonable since
IMO, The Moon was ejected from the Earth..... as per the usual formations of moons
...planets ejected from suns...etc

>> The best recorded event in human history >>>

yes just like "2001, A Space Odyssey", great movie, shame the directors had little knowledge of the real thing.

 

Actually they came fairly close to what Neil and buzz found when they landed. Oh, and planets were not ejected from suns, they form from the same disk.

 

Incorrect. Luna 20, launched February 14th 1972 and Luna 24 launched August 9th 1976, returned samples.

Uri, if you were to study a minimal amount of geology you would be aware that the composition of the moon rocks is surprisingly different from those of Earth. The devil, as always, is in the detail. Similar, yes. Pretty much the same, no, unless to someone unskilled in geochemistry.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s1531577.htm

>> The Moon's surface cooled and solidified to make its current grey and white face more than 4.5 billion years ago, say researchers who have applied new dating techniques to rocks brought back by Apollo astronauts.

This age puts the Moon's first solid rocks at about the same age Earth's first crust, bolstering the popular idea that both bodies formed crusts at about the same time and in the wake of a mega collision of a Mars-sized body with early Earth.

"For the first time we have determined the age of the Moon, which has not been done before," says German lunar researcher Dr Thorsten Kleine of the University of Munster's Institute for Mineralogy.>>

and the soup thickens. ?

 

It looks more like a consomme to me.

 

you stay away from me you you sex fiend

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

the moon's albedo is on the order of coal dust.
aren't you the same uri that is going around in another thread saying that pi is a hoax?

 

You are right. I was only considering the probes prior to Apollo 11.

 

I like it.

 

THE MOON LANDINGS WERE NOT FAKED. if anyone believes otherwise, simply state your evidence and i shall disprove it. that is all.

i like typeing in large letters

 

Well said, and welcome

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

You might do a walk through this site
http://www.clavius.org/
or this one
http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm