My time is done here .

Discussion in 'About the Members' started by river, Apr 12, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,806
    Nope. Antimatter has opposite CHARGES on its leptons and baryons. Charge, not magnetism.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    15,403

    Just common sense .
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    15,403

    Charge defined as by you billvon ; is ?
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,806
    A physical property related to electric field. You can measure it by measuring force exerted on a charged particle in an electric field.
     
  8. river

    Messages:
    15,403

    What physical property ?
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    billvon

    From post # 64

    So the Universe is Electric based .

    Galaxies , Quasars , stars , planets , moons , etc.. everything .
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2020
  10. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,806
    Charge. You just asked about it.

    Are you drunk?
     
  11. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,185
    Why do you think that is the case river?
    Alex
     
  12. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,800

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Better question/s would be...
    Are you daft?
    Are you trolling?
    Are you a nut?
     
  13. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    billvon ;

    In your post#64 , you just proved that the Universe is Electric based .
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Because matter and antimatter produce Electricity .
     
  15. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,806
    The universe is based on gravity, and the strong force, and the weak force, and electromagnetism. Electric fields make up about 1/8 of the forces in the universe.
     
  16. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,806
    No they don't. They produce different products depending on the reaction. Most likely product are plain old photons. Not "electricity."
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    Yet gravity is the weakest force of any force .

    And the other 7/8 is magnetism .
     
  18. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,806
    And the most pervasive. It's what holds our solar system together over distances of 5 billion km.
     
  19. river

    Messages:
    15,403

    The essence of charge is between antimatter and matter .
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2020
  20. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,806
    Nope. Photons and baryons actually appeared around the same time - about 10 seconds after the big bang.
     
  21. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,800
    I once read a book [in an effort to stay open minded] entitles "The Big Bang Never Happened" by Eric J Lerner. The work was quickly demolished and refuted by reputable authorities and experts on another forum.

    https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Electric_Universe
    Electric Universe (EU) is an umbrella term that covers various pseudo-scientificcosmological ideas built around the claim that the formation and existence of various features of the Universe can be better explained by electricity and magnetism than by gravity alone. As a rule, EU is usually touted as an aether-based theory with numerous references to tall tales from mythology.[2][3] However, the exact details and claims are ambiguous, lack mathematical formalism, and often vary from one delusional crank to the next.
    EU advocates can be roughly split into two groups. The first are garden-variety physics cranks
    who are convinced that they have a legitimate, revolutionary scientific theory, and that the scientific establishment is either blindly ignoring them out of misplaced faith in their own theories, or deliberately suppressing them for some greater, nefarious purpose.

    The second group is composed of various other woo-peddlers who use EU claims to prop up their main ideas (because mainstream physics would blow them apart). For these people, the EU hypothesis is a means to an end, not an end in and of itself. The more common subsets of this group include some Young Earth creationists, who wish to discredit the mainstream cosmology and geology suggesting that Earth is billions of years old, and some of the loonier fringes of global warming denialism (such as Vault-Co), who are trying to find some process outside human control that they can attribute climate change to. The latter particularly like the hypotheses of Pierre-Marie Robitaille.
    ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
     
  22. river

    Messages:
    15,403
    But the BB came from nothing . So ten seconds from nothing , came photons and baryons .

    Where is the logic ?
     
  23. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    26,800
    The same logic that applies when one asks the question, where did magnetism/electricity come form? Or where did god come from.
    The answer is we don't know the exact processes of the BB, but educated speculation tells us from a fluctuation in the quantum foam....the quantum foam being nothing and as close to nothing as we can get.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page