See Russ, this is exactly what I was talking about when saying you have no knowledge on the subject. Little do you know, but removing time from physics is an active and interesting area of research at the moment. Even the infamous Julian Barbour has began a kinematic description of laws which removes time. He says ''removing time from physics is childsplay.''
No.... ... what you are is simple. Differences in ''time'' is just a measure of change. There is no time in the universe, only change. Time is only meaningful when you have an intelligent recording device able to understand a clock ticking. A clock is what measures time and a clock is a man made object.
Speed = Distance You could have just answered this yourselves. 60mph = 1 mile / 60 units of length with a Sun or Moon diameter every length of the day / 12 And a car is already translating speed into distance with the rotation of its wheels. A clock is translating distance into time by using rotation of cogs. An atomic clock is translating distance between quantum holes. You can even get local spacetime... The bow shock of the sun distance to radius and mass. Or you can use Red shift...length
A day is still a unit of time. You haven't removed time, you just made a more cumbersome description of it that still translates the speed of 60mph to 1440 miles/day if the math is done correctly (your description and numbers are basically gibberish).
A day is a rotation around a circumference. It is distance. You have still got time transfixed in your mind. Of course it translates to speed, that's the whole point of the exercise that science translates distance to speed. That's the mistake. If you are reversing all of my figures to time then you have a self perpetuating paradox.
Er, no - a day is the time it takes earth to rotate about its axis. "rotation around a circumference" is gibberish. Angular distance covered in one unit of time. You've almost stumbled on your error in thought process: A unit of time is an interval very similar to a unit of distance. Indeed, where I live, asking "how far is it to...?" often yields an answer like "one hour", recognizing colloquially that time is an interval on a coordinate axis (a dimension( just like distance is. You didn't actually translate anything: you didn't post the math or the final answer, just a wrong/gibberish description of how you think it might be possible to remove time. That's what I mean by "translate" - you wrote a bunch of gibberish that doesn't answer the request, so I had to try to complete it for you as best I could understand it. Your description implies 60*12=720 miles/day, which is both the wrong answer and still includes time.
Well you are my proof that time doesn't exist. You are converting my maths back into time, and showing the flaws in human nature. You are using miles a day, instead of miles relative to a rotation. Your paradox will then insist on converting it all back to time again. There's no point in correcting the maths, that is the wrong argument. The post was about changing time into distance, that was shown, and the maths is counter productive.
Again: you didn't complete the math and I didn't convert it back to time, your statement still included time. Again: if you can do the math, then do it.
I'm not getting into an argument that a day is a distance. That's self explanatory. It seems that you would prefer not to just admit that time is a distance.
You are partially right: an elapsed time is a distance on a time axis/dimension. But that's clearly an accident since you are trying to argue against time, not for it. But again: Physics is done with math, not with word games and the challenge/claim was to demonstrate something mathematically (such as the given example) that currently utilitizes time, without it. All you have done is find alternate descriptions and units of time and time intervals that are still time -- but covered in verbal vomit to try to hide the fact that time is still there. I believe that if you were capable of demonstrating mathematically that time is unnecessary you would have done it by now.
Always with the personal attacks. OK fine. You are clearly a low grade moron with no science education. Gee, are we having fun now?
No, you are adding time back to my model... Speed = Distance 60mph = 1 mile / 60 units of length with a Sun or Moon diameter every length of the day / 12... relative! You are not using the relative distance. A car moving 1 mile using 60 units of length relative to the distance that the sun can be measured divided into 12 lengths. The car reaches 1 mile in distance. The sun reaches 1 length in distance. You compare the two, and you are just using distance. Of course you will add time back to that, you have a paradox in your mind. Or you will just change the argument back to the maths. I left the word 'day' in because your paradox is amusing.