You trust many claims from particular sources, and none from others, based entirely on comparing their feeds as competing propaganda - without reference to physical reality. But that's not what you did, with those claims from those sources. Yes, in your usual slippery innuendo you suggested exactly that, in your claim that your ignorance had significance in the matter. The entire example of Hun Sen in your reasoning you posted as part of your explanation for why you consistently favor strongman authoritarian over other governance, and rightwing versions over leftwing, and fascistic rightwing over other rightwing. This came up from your backing of Assad in Syria, and Russian support for Assad over other.