Maths to explain time.

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by amber, Feb 1, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nebel Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,336
    just having fun here: gravity in basements is lower, because
    (surface's max gravity falls off in both directions, inward and out) see topic, "where is more gravity, inside or out?".
    if the basement is deep enough, like reaching down to the center, gravity drops to zero. time to max. If the building is massive enough, gravity will pull up even more, less basement gravity with mass all around. and,
    better build your tall buildings near the Equator, no speed effects on the poles, just a nice twist., this.
    thank you, Amber, we are having a great time with this. Found a piece of amber once on the beach with an enclosed insect, it's body having defied increase in entropy for the longest time.
    I am voting with you, time is fundamental. flight through time without formulae.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2018
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,218
    ??? Who

    I know you didn't say that
    You said

    To which I said no BUT for satellites

    Weightlessness is a balance between the satellites falling to Earth (yes gravity) and the speed of the satellite pushing it over the horizon

    No for the simple (?) reason there is no way to place a bench with scales in any area in the space around Earth

    Turtles all the way down

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    A Satellite is not weightless , it still experiences the force of gravity and follows a curvature path because of this. If it were not for the force of gravity and Newtons of weight , the Satellite would travel a straight path and travel away from the Earth. In a free fall situation a person aboard a falling craft will fall with the craft and seem weightless. I vaguely remember seeing something once, where aeroplanes go up and down to simulate the affects of weightless. A person or object could only be weightless if they were at a position in the Universe where forces did not act.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,218
    If counting fast enough to capture each oscillation OK

    If counting fast but only capture every 3rd 5th or what ever they are not counting caesium atom oscillations. You are counting SOME of them

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,900
    It would ruin the song thats for sure.
    If you are counting the intervals slow thats ok so long as you keep up I guess but ... I may as well type slow for slow readers..neither makes sense.
    Alex
     
  9. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,900
    The person I replied to...Nebel
    Try some digital scales by placeing them upside down on the ground that should do it.
    Alex
     
  10. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,218
    But in fact, the Earth's core is substantially more dense than the outer layers (mantle and crust), and gravity actually increases a bit as you descend

    https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/18446/how-does-gravity-work-underground

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Just having fun but I take time to check details. If I made a defect in my list sure point it out
    But I think I got the info right

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,218

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Damn gazumped again

    Did that

    I can report Earth weighs more than 120 kg

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,900
    How did you see the read out?
    Alex
     
  13. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    The scales would then be measuring their own weight.
     
  14. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,218
    NO

    It follows a curved path because its speed counter balances gravity

    Satellites are able to orbit around the planet because they are locked into speeds that are fast enough to defeat the downward pull of gravity

    A satellite maintains its orbit by balancing two factors: its velocity (the speed it takes to travel in a straight line) and the gravitational pull that Earth has on it. A satellite orbiting closer to the Earth requires more velocity to resist the stronger gravitational pull.

    https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/content/why-don’t-satellites-fall-out-sky

    Weightlessness

    Counterintuitively, a uniform gravitational field does not by itself cause stress or strain, and a body in free fallin such an environment experiences no g-force acceleration and feels weightless

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,218
    The readout stuck at max with a + sign

    The scale are smart and stop and hold at the top weight registered

    Was told by the salesman the feature allowed fat people who could not see their toes the ability to step off the scales and back away until they could see the readout

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    If gravity did not have a hold on the satellite it would fly off into space and not follow a curvature path. The speed stops it falling to Earth and gravity stops if flying off into space.
     
  17. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,218
    Not when I step on the back of the scales

    PS this is a joke sub thread running

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,742
    Why?

    No.
     
  19. Michael 345 Bali in Nov closer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,218
    Which is not what you first posted

    No mention about the speed of the satellite giving the impression only gravity counted

    I'm done here

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    Because how can a state of entropy change if it were enclosed in a special box . There would be no loss or gain so the state and energy contained should remain the same. I think it would be similar to Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier's work and that nothing is ever lost or gained, but in the scenario of a special box, it includes photon energy.
     
  21. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    You did not read it how I thought I had wrote it if you can follow that.
     
  22. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,742
    Ah right.
    So you have decided - arbitrarily - that a change in entropy is what "causes" time (with no evidence, no supporting argument) and therefore you're arguing the conclusion from that premise. IOW a circular argument based on an unsupported premise.
     
  23. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    You say no, counting slow would not affect time, yet we say when the detector in the Caesium clock counts slow, it affects time, why?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page