Maths to explain time.

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by amber, Feb 1, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    In Physics , time is it's measurement , so mathematically can we define

    Δt=

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    This would define the frequency of time Δt=c

    This would also state that time is dependent to decay and that space-time was absolute.
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2018
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,697
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    OK, then I ask for your explanation why you say no. My maths explanation allows for time dilation and the twin paradox.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,697
    Because all you've done is post an equation without defining the terms or explaining how they're derived (or applied).
    Oh, and time is not "dependent to [sic] decay" nor does your claim that "space-time is absolute" follow from that equation.
     
  8. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    My apologies, I assumed you would know what the symbols meant and could see how it is derived.

    index:

    Δ=change
    t=time
    hf=high frequency photon
    S=entropy
    c=the speed of light


    I derived this from considering time dilation and why the frequency of the Caesium atom changes when the Caesium is in motion. I derived that a change in frequency was a change in the Caesium's state of entropy.
     
  9. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    I also considered time as discrete wave packets

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    and as an absolute continuous variable where Δx→0.

    I also considered ageing and that objects age but space apparently does not age, so considered objects do not age the same as space and came up with Δt≠k(t ) where k is a volume of space. More simply t≠t'

    Hence my conclusion Δt=

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    ≠ Δt'(k) and that relative time t exists relative to an absolute time t'.
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2018
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,697
    Why would I know, since you've obviously pulled the "definitions" out your a**.

    Means nothing.

    More unscientific drivel.
     
  11. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    You quite clearly do not want to discuss, you know very well what the symbols represent. They are all present math use symbols.

    However I will not just ignore you, you can now explain yourself and explain why as you say it is rubbish, give your reasons and just saying so does not count.

    start here please:Δ=change

    are u saying the triangle does not mean change?



    Meaning:

    change / difference

    Example:

    t = t1 - t0

    https://www.rapidtables.com/math/symbols/Basic_Math_Symbols.html


    P.s I think I understand, you think I have made up this equation and I do not understand it?

    I assure you I understand the full function of my own equation and what it represents.
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2018
  12. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    ΔS=Δhf A system changes in state by the change of hf in the system at any given time at c?

    To anyone who may not know this subject

    hf = The energy carried by any photon is given by plancks constant (h) multiplied by its frequency (f)
    and
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy

    ΔΩ=Δhf??
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2018
  13. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,697
    Really?
    Please quote me a source that states "hf = high frequency photon".
    Likewise explain how the UNITS of hf (kg.m[sup]2[/sup]/s[sup]2[/sup])/S (kg m2 s−2 K−1) = t (seconds). (I.e. dimensional analysis shows you to be wrong - the unit of the result turns out to be K[sup]-1[/sup] not s). Joules/ Joules per Kelvin does NOT = seconds.

    And yet we're supposed to just take your word for it without explanation?

    No, you don't.

    Exactly: hf is NOT a "high frequency photon".
     
  14. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    huh? The energy carried by a photon is defined hf , so it is a hf photon . Please do not turn the discussion into a discussion about definitions.
    When a photon is absorbed by an entropy the hf is divided by the entropy of the system.
     
  15. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,697
    No.
    hf is the energy (it can apply to electrons, photons...). Merely saying "it's a photon" does nothing.
     
  16. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    Then I will change my wording just to satisfy your misunderstanding of the content.

    hf=high frequency

    This does not alter the equation in anyway.

    ΔS=Δhf

    Δt=ΔS
     
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,365
    True. It's still gibberish.
     
  18. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    Hows is it gibberish? Please explain, it looks correct to me.
     
  19. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,697
    Wrong - it's nothing to do with "my misunderstanding" it's about your sloppy (or ignorant) definition.

    Still wrong. Go back and read my posts that state what hf is.

    That's right, it doesn't alter the fact the equation is made up bullsh*t and is wrong.
     
  20. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    Made up and wrong ? yet I am using scientific symbols of present use, I am still waiting for you to explain why it is wrong .

    Are you really trying to say that these symbols I am using from the internet and good sources are gibberish and meaningless?
     
  21. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    OK , try it this way because it is what I mean

    ΔS=ΔE

    Δt=ΔS

    Saying hf divided by a entropy is the same as saying energy divided by an entropy in my opinion.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    =ΔT where T in this is temperature?

    P.s Thank you for your help and helping me correct my notion to be more accurate and conforming to your standards. I have got to put hf because the software will not let me put a E or pE (c).

    I believe my notion gives time a physicality in an absolute space. Objects age and time is real for the object, space does not age and is not an object, things age in space relative to space.
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2018
  22. amber Registered Member

    Messages:
    323
    This could also define time to be a quantifiable measurement directly proportional to ageing. This definition would also show the true genius behind Einstein and show how his work was such brilliance.
     
  23. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,365
    Well, because "high-frequency" is an adjective. It's not a variable, and it's not a unit for anything - it's not even a noun.

    You are talking about things of which you know nothing, just to get a reaction.

    That's trolling.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page