Mathematical proof that God exists?

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by phreaked, Dec 23, 2001.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 2
  1. Vortexx

    Vortexx Skull & Bones Spokesman Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,242
    Vortexx, Dec 11, 2002
    #21

  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. EmptyForceOfChi

    EmptyForceOfChi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,848
    0+0=0 Proves that the universe has always existed in some form.


    peace.
     
    EmptyForceOfChi, Oct 11, 2008
    #22

  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Hercules Rockefeller

    Hercules Rockefeller Beatings will continue until morale improves. Moderator

    Messages:
    2,828

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    No, it proves that you haven’t any idea what you are talking about, and that you are an annoying fool for pointlessly resurrecting a thread for no good reason.
     
    Hercules Rockefeller, Oct 11, 2008
    #23

  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Stryder

    Stryder Keeper of "good" ideas. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,105

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    "Nothing to see here, Please move along!"
     
    Stryder, Oct 11, 2008
    #24
  8. wesmorris

    wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    god exists in the sense that ideas are part of reality, that's it. beyond that it cannot be proven or disproven.
     
    wesmorris, Oct 11, 2008
    #25
  9. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    God is mathematical fact. QED.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    OilIsMastery, Oct 15, 2008
    #26
  10. BenTheMan

    BenTheMan Dr. of Physics, Prof. of Love Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,967
    BenTheMan, Oct 15, 2008
    #27
  11. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    OilIsMastery, Oct 15, 2008
    #28
  12. D H

    D H Some other guy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,257
    Philosophers still can't figure out how an arrow can possibly move. Logical arguments that god exists aren't worth the paper they are scribbled upon.

    Granting for the sake of argument that such a proof is correct, WTF makes you think it is your god to which the proof is referring?
     
    D H, Oct 15, 2008
    #29
  13. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    That is nonsense. Aristotle solved Zeno's [alleged] Arrow Paradox thousands of years ago. FYI it's 2008 now.
     
    OilIsMastery, Oct 15, 2008
    #30
  14. D H

    D H Some other guy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,257
    Modern philosophers think otherwise.
    Alba Papa-Grimaldi, "Why Mathematical Solutions of Zeno's Paradoxes Miss the Point: Zeno's One and Many Relation and Parmenides' Prohibition", The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 50, 1996.
     
    D H, Oct 15, 2008
    #31
  15. saureus123

    saureus123 Registered Member

    Messages:
    1
    why not a proof by contradiction?

    why not a proof by contradiction?

    find an "element" in the "set" of natural events which must be explained by science (since we are prooving god doesnt exist) then reach the conclusion that science can not explain it.

    therefore, by iff previous arguement, god must exist.

    just a thought - i am in no way an expert.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2011
    saureus123, Nov 3, 2011
    #32
  16. origin

    origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,890
    This is what is known as a strawman. The proof is based on a false assumption that cellular life is the result of random atomic interaction. No one in their right mind thinks that a cellular organism was just appeared out of random interaction of atoms.
     
    origin, Nov 3, 2011
    #33
  17. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    This is the second time this thread has been raised from the dead since it was started back in 2001.

    Time to give it a decent burial, I think.
     
    James R, Nov 4, 2011
    #34
Page 2 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page