EDIT: For any thinking scientist..... I would recommend putting all the people in this thread on ignore except for mercaptan. The rest is the ramblings of the mentally troubled or the cowardly who are afraid of new knowledge from unapproved sources........... OK. I think I have about proved to myself that scientists are no different from high schoolers. Because I am an honest man, I always verify my feelings before I make a final decision. Happeh Theory says that Masturbation will make you blind and crippled. It can lead to heart attack, anxiety, asthma symptoms, bad posture, stomach problems, mental problems, etc etc etc. It is difficult to emphasize how much damage can be done to the body thru excessive masturbation. Happeh Theory plainly says that Excessive Masturbation Excessive Sex Excessive Physical exertion Injection of Drugs Snorting of Drugs can produce similar symptoms. Sloping shoulders, weak arm, weak leg etc as described above. Here is the challenge. The other thread is full of personal attack. I have people who claim to be in their 40's and 50's. I have people who claim to be professionally employed as scientists. I have people who claim to fly around the world with the elite. All of these people feel that I am wrong. Now is your chance to prove it. Make a scientific inquiry. Ask a pertinent question. Prove that you have thought about what I have said, and reached a reasonable conclusion. Rules for this thread: 1) "Just Because" - is not a valid scientific refutation of what I say 2) "I am 50 and neither I nor my friends believe this" - is not a valid scientific refutation of what I say. 3) "I am a high status person and I fly around the world teaching high status people" - is not a scientific refutation of my theory. 4) "People do that naturally" - is not a scientific refutation of my theory. 5) "crazy, retard, fool, delusional, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc" - These are not scientific refutations of my theory. Those are personal attacks. Let me repeat. Those.....Are.......Not.....Scientific......Terms.....Of......Critical......Thinking 6) You cannot ask for a scientific study or the corroboration of other scientist. I am the originator of this theory. 7) You cannot propose a million dollar or 10 year study as the only way to "prove" what I say. We all know that is you trying to win the argument by setting impossible standards. 8) You must acknowledge that you have looked at what I label evidence. You cannot run away from it because it proves you are wrong and I am right. 9) If you disagree with something, you must explain why. No "That is rubbish" and stalking off with your nose in the air. You must eloquently and understandably state your disagreement as you would for a class, or for a report at your place of employment, or in a real debate.