Master Theory (edition 3)

So basically you'll only listen to anyone who tells you what you want to hear? Like I said, that's dangerous and a great way to delude yourself.

How many were purchased by actual physicists? I shouldn't have to explain that science is not a popularity contest.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I stayed thinking in alphanumeric's objections to the proposition that not individual but many particles arrangments must be considered being present in high energy accelerators phenomena and I want to clarify better my point.

Trying to explain how these phenomena would be explained by the new theory I considered the concept of "bunch" of particles but now I think this is a mistake because actually the more specific and accurate concept of trains of particles must be considered. The concept of trains of particles can be found for instance in the following sections of the website: http://www.geocities.ws/anewlightinphysics/sections/Section4-2_The_photons_interference_and_diffraction.htm and http://www.geocities.ws/anewlightinphysics/sections/Section4-5_The_electron_diffraction.htm.

There are two main phenomena in the argumentation.
The first is about energy radiation in the accelerators. Currently is considered that the observed one is due to the radiation of accelerated charges predicted by current theory which is consequence of the retarded electric potential of the particles (Lienard-Wiechert potential). In my theory the electric and magnetic potentials are instantaneous and so there's no intrinsic radiation possible by an accelerated charge. In the new theory the photons' radiation in the accelerators would be produced by the interaction of some of the accelerated particles of the proposed travelling trains with some of the huge amount of neutrinos which in the new theory are present in any place of the space. These photons are produced in a similar way photons are produced when electrons changes its energy level in an atom. The particles delivers their energy to neutrinos which in the new theory can become photons and so "radiating energy". I consider that in the old experiments made in old accelerators the same as in the new accelerators, always trains of particles were and are are present. Since it can be thought that the first particles of the trains would "open the way" for the particles behind in a linear train of particles seems reasonably that no easily appreciable change in the radiation would be observed with trains of different sizes are being observed. The argument that lot of more charge present would produce observable difference in this phenomenon is then well justified.
The second argued phenomena is about a difference in the thickness of the trails the particles produce in the ionization chambers. The same consideration applies here. As particles travel in arrangments of linear trains, the first one "open the way" for the others behind and so the trails appear to be the same for different trains with different number of particles which would be similar to those of individual particles.

What I want to show is that the new theory has a good potential to explain even the experiments in high energy physics but may be the involved phenomena would need not so simple but rather ellaborated considerations which would need some deeper comprehension of the new theory which would need more time dedicated to it. The new theory is totally new point of view in Physics and so totally new explanations in lot of things would be expected.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Don't spam the forum with your website, nobody with any science educations cares.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Out of place comment. This is the "Alternatives Theories" subforum and where preciselly alternatives to some mainstream considerations are analized and I'm presenting mine. It's not spamming anyway. And note I were discussing this subject with alphanumeric and przyk for a while here in the thread. Definetly you are out of place here.

 

You are aware this is a forum, aren't you? If you want to have a private conversation, this is not the place. Alternative theories are fine but advertising your website to get more hits is not what this forum is for.

 

Your comments continue out of place. I'm not interested in a private conversation nor in advertising it here and you are wrong stating that. The post shows very well the intention to discuss a specific subject in deep. You really don't care about the subject and just don't want me posting anything. Better for you would be if I delete my account in the forum isn't it? Unfortunatelly there are not well solved things in current Physics and I'm one of those who think and have alternatives (right or wrong) to work on. Some subject, interesting for me, appeared here and I'm discussing it here in the alternative forum. If you don't have anything to contribute about please don't post just bothering comments.

 

Yeah that is the way I feel sometimes, but what I would really like would a bit more of an honest debate from you.

 

More honest than posting what I believe?
Your posting is really nonsense.
Bye...