Hi everybody. Following the recent banning of a couple of posters, I've seen a lot of comments saying "If these people were banned, then why weren't X, Y and Z also banned? They're much worse." So, here's a tentative proposal. How about the administrators give you all what you keep asking for? We'll have a mass banning of all the people that people don't like. If that's what you want, that is. Here's how I propose it will work: There will be a nomination thread, in which anybody can nominate any other member for banning. This will be a special exception to the normal rule against ban threads. All may participate in the nomination process. Following the nomination process, a vote thread will be started to determine votes for and against the banning of each nominated member. After the voting has ended, any member who receives a majority of votes for his or her banning, and, say, more than 20 ban votes overall, will be immediately and permanently banned from sciforums. Please vote on whether you wish this process to go ahead, as I have suggested. If there is a majority vote in favour of mass bannings in the current thread, then I will proceed with the rest of the process. Comments and suggestions are also welcome. Post them in this thread. I hope this will make all those crying out for mass bannings happy.