Agent@5, although this was from another thread, it got me thinking quite a bit. In the end I decided that 'their argument,' was essentially right....and wrong. I can't decide. I know that the winners get to say what's right and wrong, and they usually shout down the minority faction as soon as possible, does this make the majority methods morally wrong? This is confusing me, because the winners get to define their own moral code... For 'them' to say that your opinion doesn't matter seems basically correct, as it isn't likely to change anything, but there's still an undertone that these people think your opinion doesnt hold any value Any thoughts?