main evidence for the growing earth

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by heyuhua, Jul 16, 2018.

  1. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    One of the longest running and most controversial theories in geology is the Expanding Earth theory. From the earliest school classes to the most advanced university geology lectures we are all taught that the size of the Earth has been constant and unchanging for thousands of millions of years, so virtually everyone is astonished when first presented with evidence for an Expanding Earth. Some people are so shocked by the array of observations supporting an Expanding Earth model they simply deny there is any evidence for expansion. This rejection of the observations can become very animated at times but a few people are sufficiently curious to carefully investigate the facts indicating that the Earth has expanded over geological time. Some of the more well known investigators into the Expanding Earth theory are professors of geology and other sciences, who continue to examine the supporting evidence and report the results of their observations in various scientific papers and books. This history of the Expanding Earth theory is still developing today as these new scientific observations are examined and debated. The most widely known geological evidence for Earth expansion is a simple reconstruction of the ancient continents and ancient ocean floor like a gigantic jigsaw puzzle. The continents are ancient and some regions have existed for more than 3,800 million years but in geological time scales the ocean floor is relatively young and ranges from only about 200 million years old at the continents to areas at the mid-ocean ridges that are still forming today. When the dinosaurs first evolved none of today's ocean floor existed.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Quick Links...Reduced Gravity EarthEarth ReconstructionsExpanding Earth DataExpanding Earth HistoryProbability anaylisisMy Book Details

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    An animated Expanding Earth reconstruction using spherical trigonometry
    Earth to expand with a constant mass, or were it expanded with an increasing mass. These two major variations of the Expanding Earth theory became known as the Constant Mass Expanding Earth or the Increasing Mass Expanding Earth.This is why the dinosaurs' large size is so interesting for the Expanding Earth theory. In 1987 I realized that the dinosaurs' large size could be explained by a reduced gravity and then soon realized that the most likely cause of a reduced gravity was a smaller diameter, less massive Earth. I'd never heard of the Expanding Earth theory before reasoning that the dinosaurs must live in a reduced gravity, but when I did learn about the geological evidence for an Expanding Earth it was soon evident that a Reduced Gravity Earth is exactly what an Increasing Mass Expanding Earth also predicted. Both theories use very different lines of reasoning and evidence but they both point to the same astonishing conclusions.By the early 1990s I had produced my own Expanding Earth reconstructions with a computer program using spherical trigonometry and one of these animated reconstructions is shown above. Other people had produced similar reconstructions before - there are even more today - and one of the most convincing aspects of the Expanding Earth theory must be that these reconstructions all look so alike. It must surely provide reassurance that the reconstructions are reasonably accurate.Some of the best reconstructions available today are on YouTube as short Expanding Earth videos. Neal Adams’ reconstructions are popular but the Australian geologist Dr James Maxlow’s reconstructions also have the added advantage that the geological evidence behind the reconstructions are explained in detail within his book, Terra Non Firma Earth.[2]If you would like to try to produce your own reconstructions the raw data for the age of the ocean floor can be obtained from institutions like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).[3] NOAA is presenting the raw data of the age of the ocean floor and is not supporting the Expanding Earth theory in any way so exactly the same raw data is used in plate tectonic reconstructions. By 1994 I had also joined the ever growing number of authors that supported the Expanding Earth with the publication of my book, Dinosaurs and the Expanding Earth. This received praise from various sources and many noted the significance of the evidence predicting a Reduced Gravity Earth and its implications for the Expanding Earth. The most likely explanation for the Expanding Earth is an Increasing Mass Expanding Earth.Today some of the evidence for the concept of dinosaurs living in reduced gravity has been repeated in many scientific papers and books including, Earth Universe Cosmos, Terra Non Firma Earth, Gravity and Expanding Earth - and the list is still growing.If the Increasing Mass Expanding Earth is the correct solution for the evidence, then were has the extra mass come from? I believe the most logical explanation is that cosmic material regularly adds extra mass to the Earth. Yearly ‘cosmic showers’ adds small amounts of materials over short periods, but over geological time we know there are ‘cosmic storms’ that must add vast amounts of new material. This cosmic material is transported by geological processes that we observe today (erosion, sediment transport and subduction), into the interior of the Earth where it separates out into lighter and heavier elements.
    Further Reading
    http://www.dinox.org/expandingearth.html
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,993
    LOL. You don't show us the other side of that globe, which is just one big sea.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,579
    At least you put this crap in the right forum section. Bravo!
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,527
    There's a problem with this theory if the earth is flat, and the sun has an iron core, and the dinosaurs were co-extant with Noah. And...
     
  8. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,493
    My theory is that Earth is contracting and will eventually become a Black Hole. The evidence is controversial but so was the Tectonic Plate Theory at one time. More and more people are agreeing with the Contracting Earth Theory and it's main detractors are just the scientific community (and the government).
     
    RADII likes this.
  9. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,993
    ...and reality.
     
  10. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,440
    fyi
    it is estimated that earth gains up t0 100,000 tons of mass each year from comets and meteorites, while losing about 90- 95,000 tons of hydrogen and helium and from radioactive decay-----------------
    net/net we may be gaining about a billionth of the mass of the earth every million years-----or, ................. we may be loosing a like amount.
     
    spidergoat likes this.
  11. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,993
    If we have kids the dirt will increase.
     
  12. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,493
    Actually, I misspoke, My Black Hole Theory of the Earth is actually officially known as the White Hole Theory. It appears to be black because light can't escape but once you cross the event horizon everything is white or as I like to call it anti-dark matter.
     
  13. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,993
    So Earth is a contracting White Hole?
     
  14. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,493
    You've read my work? Excellent!
     
  15. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,993
    No, I examined some used toilet paper. A sharp eye can detect the difference.
     
  16. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,493
    Au contraire. Einsteins equivalence principle says there is no difference.
     
  17. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,993
    Difference in your theory and crappy toilet paper. I'm good with that.
     
  18. spidergoat Venued Serial Membership Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,205
    Lots of dust and meteorites fall on Earth, so yes, it's mass is probably increasing slightly.
     
  19. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,571
    First reaction: Nobody could be stupid enough to believe that.

    Second reaction: Apparently they can.

    (By the way, learn what a theory is.)
     
    origin likes this.
  20. Dr_Toad It's green! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,527
    But isn't that counteracted by the continual gas emissions of cows and politicians? The earth shouldn't even need turtles anymore..
     
    origin likes this.
  21. Michael 345 Bali tonight Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,527
    Well, true fact, here in Australia we are doing our bit.

    Kangaroos have much the same diet as cows but don't fart

    Seems they have a gut with a different make up. Scientists are working out the difference to see if they can make a cow gut the same

    (Info from QI)

    If we, Earth, are/is gaining weight the poor turtle at the bottom will have splayed legs soon

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,440
    Y'all milk kangaroos?
     
  23. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,579
    I thought the longest running controversies in science is how can people come up with such stupid ideas and still have enough intelligence to survive.
     

Share This Page