Love included...

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Counter, Jul 26, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Michael 345 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,206
    No

    Not read you

    Read post yes

    See word - process word - understand word - move onto next word

    Repeat until no more words - string words together in sequence

    Understand sequence = NO

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
    If by "read you" you mean do I have a clue what you are asking for, then no... no I do not. Sorry

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Counter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    Have you written 1×10×2×10×3×10×4×10 (and calculated the answer?)

    If you do not it is inevitable you cannot understand what I'm saying.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
    1×10×2×10×3×10×4×10 = 240,000

    I'm still not understanding what you are saying...
     
  8. Counter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    Did any of those combinations produce artificial intelligence?
     
  9. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
    Er, not that I'm aware of... how would/should a math problem produce artificial intelligence?
     
  10. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
  11. Counter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    Early computers were calculators. They still are today. Not one out of every possible calculation produced artificial intelligence. Do you believe such a theory will remain forever due to this?
     
  12. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
    I don't believe artificial intelligence is as simple as a series of math problems. Logic processes will be a requirement for any sort of AI to function.
     
  13. Counter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    ...but wouldn't such logic gates use the operators shown above (+×÷-)?
     
  14. Baldeee Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,017
    They would use many operators, not just mathematical.
    The common logic gates of OR, AND, NOR, NAND, XOR would be examples of some.
    But a linear mathematical equation will never produce AI in the same way that a single molecule of water is not wet.
     
  15. Counter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    Logic gates still use mathematical operators.
     
  16. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
    The problem is, you are basically trying to say that a single molecule of carbon cannot produce life, thus carbon based life forms are impossible.
     
  17. Counter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    A single molecule? I (and hopefully you too) have tried ALL possibilities...
     
  18. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
    You have tried every possible numeric combination, up to infinity? I would wager that would take a while...
     
  19. Counter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    Yeah, yeah, tell me that again...
     
  20. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,575
    Counter, people are trying to oblige your attempt to get an answer to whatever question it is you are asking. Can you meet them partway and write more than a single contextless sentence at a time?

    It's as if you're hoping that everyone is just waiting around to be inspired by the concepts you are raising, and all you have to do is give them a nudge in the right direction, and they'll do all your work for you.

    If you have an idea, and you want to explore it, do some work to explore it, instead of fobbing the work off on others.

    Your subject line has nothing to do with your opening post, or any other post.
    Your opening post is simply an exercise in playing with numbers - it makes no attempt to explain why it might be interesting to examine.
    Your subsequent posts drift off into non sequiturs about artificial intelligence and logic gates.

    It's not that I'm saying there is no connection; it's that I'm saying you have an obligation to communicate those connections effectively, and you are not doing so.

    Have some respect for your readers; they are trying to respect you.
     
  21. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
    I'm slowly starting to think that either there is a massive language barrier in play, or something else entirely...
     
  22. Counter Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    431
    I already have a job.
     
  23. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,012
    I... don't recall anyone claiming otherwise? This seems like another non sequitur to me...

    Honestly, given that nobody has a bleeding clue what you are talking about at this point, I am wondering what the point of this thread even is anymore... can you please try and explain just what, exactly, it is you want us all to do?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page