# Love included...

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by TheFrogger, Jul 26, 2017.

Not open for further replies.
1. ### Michael 345New year. PRESENT is 69 years oldValued Senior Member

Messages:
7,011
No

See word - process word - understand word - move onto next word

Repeat until no more words - string words together in sequence

Understand sequence = NO

3. ### KittamaruAshes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
13,938
If by "read you" you mean do I have a clue what you are asking for, then no... no I do not. Sorry

5. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,281
Have you written 1×10×2×10×3×10×4×10 (and calculated the answer?)

If you do not it is inevitable you cannot understand what I'm saying.

7. ### KittamaruAshes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
13,938
1×10×2×10×3×10×4×10 = 240,000

I'm still not understanding what you are saying...

8. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,281
Did any of those combinations produce artificial intelligence?

9. ### KittamaruAshes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
13,938
Er, not that I'm aware of... how would/should a math problem produce artificial intelligence?

Messages:
13,938
11. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,281
Early computers were calculators. They still are today. Not one out of every possible calculation produced artificial intelligence. Do you believe such a theory will remain forever due to this?

12. ### KittamaruAshes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
13,938
I don't believe artificial intelligence is as simple as a series of math problems. Logic processes will be a requirement for any sort of AI to function.

13. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,281
...but wouldn't such logic gates use the operators shown above (+×÷-)?

14. ### BaldeeeValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,477
They would use many operators, not just mathematical.
The common logic gates of OR, AND, NOR, NAND, XOR would be examples of some.
But a linear mathematical equation will never produce AI in the same way that a single molecule of water is not wet.

15. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,281
Logic gates still use mathematical operators.

16. ### KittamaruAshes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
13,938
The problem is, you are basically trying to say that a single molecule of carbon cannot produce life, thus carbon based life forms are impossible.

17. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,281
A single molecule? I (and hopefully you too) have tried ALL possibilities...

18. ### KittamaruAshes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
13,938
You have tried every possible numeric combination, up to infinity? I would wager that would take a while...

19. ### TheFroggerValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,281
Yeah, yeah, tell me that again...

20. ### DaveC426913Valued Senior Member

Messages:
10,790
Counter, people are trying to oblige your attempt to get an answer to whatever question it is you are asking. Can you meet them partway and write more than a single contextless sentence at a time?

It's as if you're hoping that everyone is just waiting around to be inspired by the concepts you are raising, and all you have to do is give them a nudge in the right direction, and they'll do all your work for you.

If you have an idea, and you want to explore it, do some work to explore it, instead of fobbing the work off on others.

Your subject line has nothing to do with your opening post, or any other post.
Your opening post is simply an exercise in playing with numbers - it makes no attempt to explain why it might be interesting to examine.
Your subsequent posts drift off into non sequiturs about artificial intelligence and logic gates.

It's not that I'm saying there is no connection; it's that I'm saying you have an obligation to communicate those connections effectively, and you are not doing so.

Have some respect for your readers; they are trying to respect you.

21. ### KittamaruAshes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
13,938
I'm slowly starting to think that either there is a massive language barrier in play, or something else entirely...

Messages:
1,281