Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by timojin, Oct 11, 2016.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
I am a male .
After discussing the opening , I got the idea why muslims mutilate the female clitoris . I t must have been that they had problem with women Based on your point ' orgasm '
Perhaps there lesbianism was common , so to eliminate one problem reaching orgasm only through vagina and not by friction on clitoris. What you think of that if you are a female ?
You got it.
I can't believe I just read that.
If I'm in your country, hopefully the police pick you up first.
On a lighter note, if you don't live in my country, I already know your country sucks at hockey.
I have known couple of hetro females happily married but had lesbian relationship. It was probably "need to release" based, while being together in hostel/PG accommodation during studies or early employment days.
Such needy relationships appear to be more in case of females then males. I have also observed that in general hetro females are ok with intimate touches and exploring with each other, but hetro guys are not.
This enquiry serves no legitimate purpose.
It is either for titillation or for ridicule.
Uh - no.
Yes in an ugly thought, but why or good reason to mutilate the part , I see no loss for a male to get circumcised but a female ?
Well first off we're not talking about apples and apples here. There's a form of female circumcision that is very similar to male circumcision (just the clitoral hood) but when people talk about female circumcision they are usually talking about removal of the clitoris, which would be similar to removing the glans of the penis. And THAT is what the issue is.
As to why - there are a lot of reasons. Here in the US it was done because people thought it would control hysteria, epilepsy and nymphomania. In some cultures it is thought to control sexual desire in women and thus make them more faithful. Some cultures think that women are more attractive that way. Some even thought it would prevent male attributes in women.
In general it is done either out of ignorance or in an attempt to control women; there are no known benefits from the procedure and a lot of downsides. Fortunately it is on the decline; unfortunately, it is still a big issue in some places. (125 million women in Africa have been circumcised.)
Female circumcision is about controlling women and has nothing to do with lesbianism - it's a barbaric act that should be banned.
It's actually the damage of the clitoris; the organ is too large and internal for that surface damage to remove it. Nonetheless, the damage is significant.
I would argue that a lesbian becomes a lesbian because she meets a woman who is hot, kindhearted and interested in her. If there were no hot and kindhearted woman that were interested in women, then few if any women would be lesbian until the tides shifted. DE
So if you met a man who was hot, kindhearted and interested in you, would you become gay?
What makes you think the woman will see her as hot? Are you assuming attraction to the same sex in all women?
From Magic Realist Post #3
The above strongly implies that it is almost entirely genetic, which seems doubtful.
Furthermore, it seems to me that it occurs decades before menopause,
My guess is that it might be partly genetic, but triggered by environmental factors.
Simple characteristics like eye color obey very standard genetic inheritance rules.
Behavioral characteristics do not follow similar simple rules of inheritance.
I suspect that gender identity anomalies, homosexuality, & lesbianism are caused by reactions to our modern environment being very different from the pre-civilization environment prior to 5000 BC.
At the genetic level, we are not significantly different from Homo Sapiens prior to 5000 BC, but our civilized environment is very different. I wonder if there are any unbiased studies of homosexuality in modern primitive cultures.
Note that the culture of the Golden Age Greeks included a lot of homosexual activity, but they were mostly switch hitters & might have had a smaller percentage of exclusively homosexual individuals than modern Homo Sapiens.
I would believe the homosexuality among ancient Greeks is exaggerated. If you think water was not very accessible, the thought to plunge your dick and pull out shit . would make an individual think twice.
I lived in Hollywood for many years. Hollywood has a large population of both male and female homosexuals. They were all young, under 30.
Well, yeah, maybe you would think so.
To the other, I don't blame you for not being particularly educated on the ins and outs of masculine homosexual intercourse. Truth of the matter is that, while many homosexual males do attempt to maintain their bodies in such a manner as to be able to receive their partner as conveniently as possible, on such occasions that penetrating a high concentration of fecal matter is a specific consideration, it doesn't stop homosexuals any more or less than it stops men who penetrate women anally.
Seriously, I'm just guessing you probably don't want to consider the range of what various men have demonstrated themselves willing to penetrate; if you're having trouble comprehending the attraction to anal sex, I'm probably guessing the story about the time the guy died while doing a horse and the only people authorities could find to charge with a crime was the guy who filmed it, except he was invited so the trespassing charge couldn't stick, and it apparently had never really occurred to the legislature in our state to make screwing a horse illegal; or what was it about some point in ... was it Ruollah Khomeni's career? ... that a particularly infamous imam was dispensing the rules for having sex with donkeys? ... and speaking of crappy ideas I still don't get those people on the other side of the Pacific from me who occasionally get it into their heads to stick a swamp eel into their bodies, because for all the dumb stuff people stick inside themselves these things have really sharp teeth and every once in a while need to be surgically extracted from the abdominal cavity after having exited through a custom door.
And, you know, all of this simply reminds―
―that you really don't seem to have a clue what you're asking.
Understand, people aren't going to give you the graphic descriptions.
There are very few purely constricted roles among stable homosexual couples.
Sorry I had enough of this subject . I am out.
Mod Hat ― Works for me
Aye, sir. Thank you.
Separate names with a comma.