LOL! How's this: P1. Life requires matter It then follows that: 1. Life exists 2. Matter exists Agreed. Physical effects require physical causes. Yes. But this in no way requires that all physical effects are physical. What about the "physical"? The non-physical exits either way. So we have a duality ladies and gentlemen. The same can be said of yours.
Unfortunately, "P2. Only the physical exists," entered my post by mistake. That being said, your argument against that premise is very weak.
Agreed. However the point of my argument is that not only the physical exists. So does the non-physical. IN FACT, THE NON-PHYSICAL IS REQUIRED FOR THE PHYSICAL TO EXIST!!!
Or even: "P1. All foompa-loompas require a wazeewaa." I don't think this premise establishes the existence of foompa-loompas or wazeewaas, other than as placeholder labels.
Spellbound: Er... I already said "This thread...". I'd say it's more of an observation than a judgment. If you have some evidence or argument for the existence of heaven, I'm all ears.