James R's Independent Review Process

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by Gustav, Jul 1, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    33,336
    Gustav:

    It was not clear to me that you were insulting somebody else on the internet and not another member of sciforums.

    To avoid such misunderstandings in the future, I suggest that, in general, you avoid insulting other people. It's probably good advice for life, too.

    I have reversed your infraction in this instance.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Well, technically yes - though they would wind up violating laws in multiple countries, it would still be their choice (and as such, they would have to live with the consequences of such an action). The point still stands, though, that by registering on and using these forums you agree to abide by the rules set by the owners and staff. It's really no different than much of the worlds businesses to be honest - just here you don't pay for the "service" of having a place for discussion.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575

    make that 12 infractions reversed.

    please stop the persecution and witchhunt
    it is unsightly, crass and eminently unfair

    /saddened


    do you still maintain that?
    my writing style can be exploited by evil, murderous and unapolegetic mods bent on eradicating my presence here?
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    Yes.

    And make that -

    "Gustav's writing style can be exploited by evil, murderous and unapolegetic people anywhere bent on eradicating his presence."
     
  8. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    As well as by yourself. Insulting people then claiming later that you mean it in a different way. I'm not saying that's what you did, mind you.
     
  9. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575
    nevertheless, you put the "gustav is dishonest" meme out there.
    what a horrible and antagonistic mod you are for stirring up the pot
    for trolling!

    /horrified
     
  10. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Err.. no, I was not. Didn't you read that last part?
    I was just pointing out that it may very well be in your own interest to start adopting a writing style that is a little bit more apprehensible.
     
  11. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    Sweetie, perhaps you should poll the members of this forum on what they think of you.
     
  12. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575
    enmos

    i see
    what in particular was not "apprehensible" about the infracted post?
    the divider? the linked "retard"?

    i understand
    i am to make allowances for general stupidity, mental retardation and prejudice
    got it
     
  13. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    i'll start with you
    well?
     
  14. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    The fact that it was not clearly addressed to anyone else makes it look like you were still addressing the same person.

    You could have written, for example: "Cain, you incompetent little retard". Then there would have been no question as to who you meant to address.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2011
  15. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575
    i vote to ban enmos off the internets
     
  16. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Whence the hostility?
     
  17. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    Yes.



    Seriously. One makes mistakes, and many other people make up for them. So one should also be generous to make up for the mistakes of others.

    You sometimes tread the thin line of little or no generosity, especially in these SFOG threads.
    And while it is possible to convincingly argue for such a stance, it is not a community-building stance.
     
  18. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    Make a poll.
     
  19. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575
    easy enough
    you are a cain
     
  20. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    See, that is reason enough for me to ban you. Not a very smart move, my friend.
    I think you may have bigger problems than your writing style.
     
  21. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575

    stop prevaricating
    i am only interested in your opinion

    /blush
     
  22. Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575

    indeed
    that was your intent all along right by implying dishonesty
    to troll and escalate tensions

    well
    hit the ban button, you needy little troll
     
  23. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    That was not my intent at all. If it was you'd be banned by now, wouldn't you?
    Also, it seems you may have some sort of a reading disability. I wasn't implying anything of the sort.

    But.. don't push me, Gustav.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page