Hun Sen He is leader of the Cambodian People's Party. In October, 2007, Hun Sun made a surprise announcement at a graduation ceremony in front of an audience of around 3,000 that his adopted daughter is lesbian. He explained that this was a personal struggle for him and while he had learned that it was OK to be gay, he could not accept this in his own family. As a result, he is taking legal steps to disown his adopted lesbian daughter and to prevent her from any entitlement to inheritance. Nonetheless, he asked the audience to accept gays and lesbians.[1][2] Also of note, the former King of Cambodia, Norodom Sihanouk, wrote in his website journal that he supported the rights of gays and lesbians to same-sex marriage. What A Hypocrite!:shrug:
Isn't that convenient to believe? http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/325979.stm http://www.queerbychoice.com/gaygenelinks.html
It isn't hereditary, it is just how the chromosomes form in the brain. If it is a choice, why would they NOT be attracted to women either?
genetics isnt the only thing influancing human development. Hormones releaced by the woman effect unborn babies, so do virus, things consumed by the woman and the babies enviroment. Nature VIR Nurture ever herd of it?
Yeah, like how black people are stupid, asians are the smartest people, etc. Those kinds of genetics. Funny how we can support one, but not the other.
I didn't say to generalize, I said to personally specify. Even if it is a choice, they still have a right to choose.
Apparently there's evidence for black people having low IQs (in general), with whites being a bit smarter, and asians having the highest IQs of all three groups. Supported by people with impressive backgrounds on the topic as well. Yet, we deny it as nonsense. I wonder why?
You obviosly ignored me, I said NOT to generalize, but to specify personally what a person's preferrences are!
I'm sorry, did you say something? "Even if it is a choice, they still have a right to choose." Maybe for you. I believe in mass exile for such people. Retaliators will be shot; survivors will be shot again.
I like draqon's answer. "BECAUSE gay people spread AIDS, demoralize society values, they also limit people in their choices (many people feel oppressed by that which has become gay...and in order to not be seen as gay they have to not wear that and not do that so that they are not identified as gay), also gay people are slowing down population increase in humanity and even though right now it seems as a positive thing in future this will grow into a decline and the population has a chance of going extinct, furthermore gay people do not contribute to genetic pool...."
I believe in mass exile for such people. Retaliators will be shot; survivors will be shot again. This classifies as hate speech in my book. Consider yourself warned.