Is there a place for hermeneutics in math?

Discussion in 'General Philosophy' started by wegs, Oct 6, 2016.

  1. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    So finding it hot!
    We are in 2016 and you can go to 2025! Thats marvellous.
    So we earthly mortals will be leading two lives on earth itself, one here with normal progression of time 2016 onwards and second with you (again here) with 2025 onwards at unknown flow rate of time. Wow! Its not even naive, its foolish.
    How will you come back? If backward solution is rejected by people you worship?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,434
    No,

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    more amusing in the facts that beside myself, many that do not have you on ignore have continually informed you as to the errors in your thinking on similar subjects in other threads, including rpenner and James, and the other fact that your friend/colleague/brother, expletive deleted was banned for doing what you are doing...continually claiming some alternative nonsense, and continually ignoring requests for citations, links, references to support that.
    No, that's relativity: If I had the technology to achieve speeds approaching "c" and returned, I would find myself in another time, other than that shown in my frame both mechanically and biologically.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Yes, that is confusing at best, but typical of how you operate. But if you are asking if I could return back to 2016, the answer is no, not via time dilation anyway...but you have of course already been told that at least twice in this thread.
    As you have already been informed again, you don't come back:
    Whether backward time travel is allowed or not is at this stage unknown.
    With your "worship" crack, no I worship no one, but respect many greats, and at the same time feel sympathy towards those that continue to be cynical and derisive of accepted science, while unable to support what they say.
    This obviously is a mental condition that I highlighted in the "Are you a Quack" thread, that was then used as a vehicle to push Alien contact as factual, by another on whom the quack cap fitted perfectly and consequently and rightly cesspooled.
    ps: I am preparing another.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2016
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page