# Is the Higgs particle a process?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by BdS, Dec 22, 2015.

1. ### BdSRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
422
Those 2 replies dont contradict eachother?

The stars are equivalent to the the proton mass in the atomic nucleus, they are just different scaled versions I used for the example.

Where do the dense elements come from in your hydrogen cloud solar system formation?
Centrifugal force.
Gravity
transfer of momentum from photons.
The extra momentum comes from the heat and magnetic effects. Energy is conserved in the transfer of one energy to another.
As clearly stated its just a thought. When I think and propose things that makes you uncomfortable as is derived form your reply.
1 + 1 = 2 Kinetic energy. Magnetic interaction.
Its a work in progress, slowly my son.
Indeed I bet the Higgs theory was a crank version once upon a time.
Not to me.
A greater solar activity at the beginning
Yes, but it will be collected eventually by some object. How much rogue matter is collected by our solar system form other systems then?
Not yet, but its a constant per sec effect that adds up over time. Are you denying photons transfer momentum? solar sails?
Kinetic energy to potential energy.
1 + 1 = 2
The heat addition is just one of the mechanisms adding to mass, and one of the lesser effects.
Keep dreaming.
What books have you guys read? Just so I know what to stay away from...

I hope you are going to answer my question as I have yours, when I start banging at your theories.

Last edited: Jan 6, 2016

3. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
7,715
What is the point of this trolling? Are you mentally ill?
I think you must be mentally ill....... I wonder if you realise what you get if you integrate BdS......

BdS and origin like this.

5. ### originIn a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
10,676
LOL... nice one!

BdS is a crank troll who is here only to annoy. At least he is good at something.

BdS likes this.

Messages:
422
Yawn...

8. ### BdSRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
422
Something that humps like a machine?

9. ### originIn a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
10,676
No. You get this.
$\int B dS = BS + C$
C is a constant, which in this case is more BS

10. ### James RJust this guy, you know?Staff Member

Messages:
32,027
BdS:

From your reply, it looks like you have worthless imaginings and that's all.

You have not put numerical values on anything. You have not calculated anything. You have no idea, for example, whether radiation pressure from the Sun would be sufficient to push Jupiter outwards from the Sun to its present orbit or how long such a process might take if it were feasible.

The Sun cannot and has not ever ejected a planet-sized object. You have nothing that says otherwise.

Please let us know if you ever have any solid evidence or a workable theory.

Messages:
21,803
Is he the only one?
At least this one is in the right section: How about the other anti science shit being conducted elsewhere in science?
Because he is able to utter a few sciency sounding words, and a equation now and then, he gets away with it?
You of course know who I am talking about.

12. ### BdSRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
422
Yes thats right, I'll see where they progress to.
Fair enough.
Will do.

c is a small c not a big C
Got that list of books yet?

13. ### originIn a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
10,676
Wrong yet again. Who could have seen that coming?

My 3 semesters of straight physics used a book authored by Tipler.
You should definitely not look at it or you could possibly learn something, assuming you have the ability to do calculus, which seems HIGHLY unlikely.

Messages:
422
15. ### rpennerFully WiredValued Senior Member

Messages:
4,833
As usual, the headline got it wrong. It's not a majority, it's 20%. It is a majority of in a subsample of heavy stars, but most stars are not heavy stars. In fact only about 4.5% of stars are heavier than the sun, and it looks like this study only looked at stars heavier than the sun because the methodology requires them to image to stellar surface.

So the "majority" is based on 20% of a sample of stars with a mass of more than 1 solar mass which is about 4.5% of all stars, chosen at the relatively-short red giant phase near the end of their lives as fusion-powered stars.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature16171.html
http://es.ucsc.edu/~glatz/astr_112/lectures/notes19.pdf

You have a burden to relate this to the topic under discussion. It doesn't help prove you are right on a topic when you post a link to an article where the headline is demonstrably wrong.

BdS likes this.
16. ### BdSRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
422
Yes its just another effect I got to add to my 20% of particles that are decaying over a certain eV... It was more of a book mark...
And thought it would be obvious that it might be another way denser elements in the sun can make their way to the surface with magnetic repulsion. Im not limited to it being only 20% of stars, because that could change tomorrow. Im an optimist! and not bound by your indoctrination... Have you ever been in a star and measured anything in there?

Messages:
21,803
Even Imagination has its limits...Although as usual, you being a religious fanatic, have taken Einstein totally out of context: Sure, Imagine...then Experiment and observe: and then apply the knowledge.
When you are totally buried by some fucking mythical omnipotent monster deity, then you are unable to apply logic or sensibility to any worthwhile level.

18. ### BdSRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
422
You just dont want to let things evolve, because what you think you got makes you think that you are superior to everyone else. From the mans mouth who you worship? Telling you to unleash your imagination so things can evolve. I wonder why science is in crisis? lol because inept people like you hold it back...

19. ### BdSRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
422
I am a big fan of Mr Einstein's, thats why I listen to his words and not only hear them...

Messages:
21,803
Science is not in crisis> It has revealed heaps, but still heaps to go. What obviously is in crisis is fucking religion and the stupid hypocritical quackery that they estol.
http://www.brill.com/products/book/religion-times-crises
Religion in Times of Crisis

Messages:
21,803
To hear them is great: To deliberately twist them for your own agenda is not.
Remember, telling lies makes little baby jesus cry.

22. ### BdSRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
422
More like telling the truth makes OCD paddoboy cry.

23. ### BdSRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
422
How am I twisting them? when im letting my imagination run free?