dogs should be eaten, more than chicken should be, because dogs are evil creatures that hide in the sheep shell of a "friend of a human" while they commit autrocious acts as bite some....ehhem.... people through their skin and than bark at them all their life. However evil tastes crappy, so do dogs dont really taste as good as chicken do. So it is your choice.
Yes. Dogs can display some very disturbing tendencies, such as butt sniffing, vomit eating, dry humping et cetera. But, they are usually very friendly - almost too friendly - and should not be eaten.
Draqon, you get weirder everyday. As a general rule, people don't eat animals they keep as pets....but if I was starving, I'd be a "Fido fricassee" eatin' mother fucker.
wrong. dogs are evil creatures...masterminding when to bark at people when they are most relaxed...than when they are left with small children...the dogs eat the children! Vicious creatures they have only one goal, tricky humanity into submission.
So, they fatten their pet up for slaughter. Doesn't that cause emotional distress when they go and slice fido's throat?
to some emotional distress and to some emotional uplift. It is net emotional equilibrium within a society.
that is because you have not related to the society for help. Net social balance. It is like having an acid burn...treat it with basic (soap) and you will be fine.
