:bugeye: Okay. I am trying to actually wrap my brain around this. Where does it say that hugging one's child or providing comfort and positive contact with one's child or any child, is tantamount to pedophilia? He is pushing the boundary to limits that are, for lack of a better term, insane. What he has basically been pushing in this thread is that any activity or behaviour that results in the release of Oxytocin automatically becomes sexual because Oxytocin is released during sex. So if a parent hugs a child and Oxytocin is released in the body of either parties to the hug, it suddenly becomes sexual contact. If a woman breastfeed and Oxytocin is released, it is automatically sexual and ergo, incest. And then, to make matter worse, he comes out with insane statements that a parent hugging their children can be seen as being sexual predators who are grooming a child for sex. I'm sorry, while he may say that some may take it that far, he is basically the first person I have ever come across who has taken it that far. And believe me, I've met some weirdos in the past who have come out with crazy stuff and done horrible and stupid stuff. But he is the first person I have ever seen who stated that hugging one's own child can be construed as 'grooming' as a pedophile grooms his/her potential victim. Now, he either believes this and keeps on pushing the point. Or he is attempting to inflame members who will take offense to such comments. Why belabour the point? Does he believe that breastfeeding is incest because of the release of Oxytocin? Does he think it should be taken that far? What is his motive in this thread? Is there something else he is trying to convey?