Based upon scientific findings in the area of sexual chemicals that are responsible for bonding, it may provide evidence for moralists to justify broadening incest and molestation laws. You decide. I can send you the link to the article I am referencing in pm, but I do not have 20 posts, so I can not provide it here. Here is a quote from the article: Oxytocin is released during sex and during breastfeeding. Incest or not? Children have what is called "skin hunger" and Oxytocin is released when they are touched by their parents. US law uses legal phrasing that bases the law on the occurrence of sexual emotions in a parent or a child. A parent or child may touch each other in non-sexual ways. This phrasing implies that the touching does not create the release of oxytocin in either one of their bodies.Does this turn the entire body into a sexual genital creating a new moral legal claim for molestation based upon scientific evidence?