Is Abortion Murder?

Discussion in 'Ethics, Morality, & Justice' started by Bowser, Aug 22, 2015.

?

I Believe Abortion Is...

  1. Murder

    5 vote(s)
    14.7%
  2. A Woman's Choice

    25 vote(s)
    73.5%
  3. A Crude Form of Birth Control

    6 vote(s)
    17.6%
  4. Unfortunate but Often Necessary

    18 vote(s)
    52.9%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Staff Member

    Messages:
    34,667
    Not that I'm aware of. I think we're still at Fertilization-Assigned Personhood and whether or not women are human beings and have human rights.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    United States federal law does not go into that. Abortion is legal in this country, and the action qualifies as abortion rather than murder so long as the fetus has not been legally transformed into a person by virtue of having been born.

    The various states have their own laws about abortion, and some do indeed prohibit the procedure if the fetus has reached some sort of milestone. That is usually an arbitrary number of weeks after conception. Perhaps one of the states, instead, defines it as the point at which a heartbeat can be detected, but that would be rather difficult to enforce in actual practice since, obviously, there will be no heartbeat after the abortion has been performed. The law would have to require the surgeon not only to check for a heartbeat, but to record it and retain the recording--with a time/date stamp, of course.

    I have, happily, never lived in one of the Redneck states that treat their women like second-class citizens--now that they're required by federal law to treat Afro-Americans as first-class citizens. So I have no personal knowledge of their abortion laws and the way they enforce them.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. birch Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,885
    Is this a technical question? When you kill a living organism, isn't it murder?

    Every living organism is a murderer on some level, even those who eat only plants. If you eat meat, isn't that a murdered animal? When you just go outside and walk, you'll be murdering anything under your feet. When you call the orkin man to rid of pests, isn't that murder? When you go to war, isn't that murder?

    The reason why abortion can be justified is pregnancy doesn't occur independently, outside of the woman's body nor independent of her genes ( minus exceptions).

    Sometimes murder is necessary. A woman who rejects the pregnancy would be apt to not take care of herself and not care for the offspring. That would be worse for the offspring.

    And no, saving everyone to give up for adoption is unrealistic. You see there is an overabundance of people and unwanted or orphan children as it is.

    How can any society using empty shortsighted platitudes justify the force of birth when it cannot even assure its livelihood anyway? Ridiculous.

    Perhaps more societal pawns and slaves? or burdens on society? Society hasnt even got it together for those that are already here and its worried about more unwanted? Insane? Who cares what happens or its quality of life after its born, right? Not nearly as important?

    It amounts to feigned caring ignorance or dismissive of real-life, long-term consequences if born.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2015
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    51,799
    I agree with you in general, but your terminology needs correcting. Not all killing is murder. Soldiers acting within the law, who kill during war aren't murderers. Prisoners who are put to death weren't murdered. Killing someone in self defense isn't murder. Abortion isn't murder.
     
  8. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,102
    Not content with terrorising adults, pro-lifer terrorists have now taken to targeting and terrorising small children.

    On the morning of Nov. 16, elementary school students arriving at Two Rivers Public Charter School were greeted by a banner that read "They kill babies nearby! Tell your parents to stop them," allegedly held by a man who spent five years in prison for possessing a pipe bomb he planned to use to blow up an abortion clinic.

    Now Two Rivers seeks an injunction to prevent the group of anti-abortion protestors, who object to a Planned Parenthood clinic set to be opened next year nearby, from staging their demonstrations outside the school, according to a complaint filed in Washington D.C. Superior Court Wednesday.

    [...]

    The first protest the school mentions in its 30-page complaint occurred on Aug. 27, during parent-student-teacher conferences. That morning three people set up large posters with pictures of dismembered fetuses on them, positioned so students and parents had to pass them before entering the school, the school claims in the complaint.

    Lauren Handy, one of the five protestors named as defendants in the suit, shouted at students -- some of whom are as young as three -- and parents who were entering the elementary school, according to the complaint.

    "Tell your parents that you don't want to go to school next to a baby-killing center," Handy allegedly yelled at students and parents entering the school.

    On Nov. 1, Jonathan Darnel, another protestor named in the complaint, sent an email to nine Two Rivers officials urging them to stop the Planned Parenthood construction by citing nine disturbances the clinic would bring with it, according to the complaint.

    The email warned Two Rivers administrators of people "you wouldn't want your students interacting with" walking to the clinic; potential violence between "abortion-minded women" and their significant others; Planned Parenthood's "overtures" to middle-schoolers in order to "hook them on the perverse sexual lifestyle that they promote;" and the "loud" protests of anti-abortion sidewalk counselors trying to talk women out of abortions, according to the complaint.

    At the end of the message Darnel insisted if the school didn't respond he would "feel a moral obligation to alert the community (including the parents of your students) [himself]," the complaint says.

    "I'm sure you don't want to see me, my anti-abortion friends and our graphic images any more than we want to be in your neighborhood," Darnel wrote in bold type in his email, which is reproduced in the complaint.

    Two weeks later Darnel, Handy, a man named Robert Weiler Jr. and another unidentified person were back outside the school holding the sign near the student drop-off lane, the school says. The group constant moved around the school to thwart Two Rivers' attempts to shuttle students around the protests, according to the complaint.

    Weiler was sentenced in 2006 to five years in prison after he was caught with a pipe bomb and a gun he intended to use to attack an abortion clinic in nearby Greenbelt, Maryland. He was released in 2011, but was arrested again in 2014 outside the same facility, according to the complaint.

    The school says that at another protest, Larry Cirigano -- also a named defendant in the suit -- stood near the entrance of the middle school holding a sign with a picture of a bloody aborted fetus. Darnell shouted at students entering the school, "They are going to murder kids right next door if your parents don't do something about it," according to the complaint.

    Two Rivers claims the protests and others planned for the coming months have caused irreparable harm to the school and its students. Some children have reported feeling "upset and sick," sometimes opting to stay away from the school, according to the complaint.

    "One student was so upset by this incident that he began to feel sick and had to go home," the complaint says. "He was only able to return to school the next day with the promise that the school counselor would meet him at the front door."
     
    Truck Captain Stumpy likes this.
  9. Truck Captain Stumpy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    709
    the sad thing is: psychological torture (and terrorism) can be far more scarring and long-lasting than physical torture, especially when directed at youth in the formative stages

    of course, that is likely their reasoning as well. they probably think: if they scar/scare the children now, they will have future zealots to join their cause

    none of them consider the logical or scientific approach that is also a natural part of humans - or the inquisitive nature of children. the need to find answers.

    IMHO - Their tactic is not only going to backfire, but it will also label them (the terrorist extremist protesters) as threats and as something to be avoided by children or others (unless the persons in question are seeking attention and has fanatical leanings to begin with)
     
    Kristoffer likes this.

Share This Page