intent in place of principle in mean of humanity?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Anew, Apr 4, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Anew Life isn't a question. Banned

    Messages:
    461
    so here we have the presented thread title [intent and it's place/relationship to principle] under the subject vestige of h-u-m-a-n s-c-I-e-n-c-e... very goooood. imagine, humans actually enjoy variable sciences of !what it is to be human...And runn away from the realism of existence in name of neglect of principle effect of the realism of 'cause and value... and are mostly talented in hope disguised as worth which smuts our educate representation.

    now intent: defined as impression and then reason concerning the values of the word principle:

    principle then defined as: human integrity threshold relative to interest.

    interest then defined as need for value.... ahhhh here now to gander that human science is really defined as what humans present, and invent of represent.

    ***************************
    ]It is that a being may read what from above here. at this website one likes worth to be written for discussion value....
    ]discussion is defined as: agreeing with an integrity presented & adding valuably, or soluting a lack of integrity which is discursive of fact.
    ]fact is defined as realism.
    ]reality is defined as principle.


    ************************

    ? is it that the word discussion intentfully is synonymous to commentary somewhat so.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. mathman Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,433
    Please translate into English.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    There is no such word in the English language as "intentful" or "intentfully."

    Fraggle Rocker
    Moderator, Linguistics
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    Your language use is unusual, but your point is soluble, at least. You're saying that principle or bias leads 'reality' in the presenter? Sure. That's people for you, though.
     
  8. Anew Life isn't a question. Banned

    Messages:
    461
    aspect of the " I' problem midst human providorship is really related to language & has much to do with humans nonacceptance positionality's. obviously beings pick about words which weren't in their life earlier, which actually can defer much false commitment in professionalism, to a more promising standing. many have stuckisms concerning definition instead of worth.


    *In some ways, it had been said that yoko ono and john lennon had mention of represent concerning being 'conceptual artists'; looking at single words relative to the value of being a nonviolent human
    in the name of "worth' as a beginning word to reason with of concept is something that I have found to be of value. looking at the word 'worth" and the evolution of written and spaken language and its place of helping humanness achieve beyond it's violence... I may invent, understanding that finally inventing words looking at my german language talent Is that the word 'wort''' in german relates almost directive of becoming or, became,had been, and literally 'word is the simple basic translation... where also the word 'war is a synonym to 'wort' and is defined as 'had been... anyhow one likes words and means nonviolent to end violence and it is that the realism that 'let's say a human being is stuck in means of language difference that encourage the English definition of 'war which comment of human fighting.. realistically the gradation of beings whom may be blamed for fighting or competeing attitudes of discord, are often bothered into such place of expression whatever layers of social 'networking' life attachments.. meanwhile any representation these days of some or more people is by some defined as a network, and the realism that groupishness and the means of life style and language difference and technological misuse have overtime gone to far. people haven't been able to afford groupish gangish technological direct behaviorism since first person whom bothered 'spying with it's channel ended up making it an o.k.
    in some ways seems the confusion of business as related to family before worth to do so, and or family misuseing so called 'priveledges' or expecting priveledges hasn't been a worth, when it comes to technological matters., especially since the 1970's.


    there are those that choose 'she, said' 'he,said' realisms and decline human providorship, with causal determinate problems. And those whom welcome 'moderate perspective' as a means of returning to wellness., and aren't the harm of challengeing others and don't neglect, or compare or create grief for others, and there are some that do and need a somehow of return to goodness..having mattered in exaggerated means of creativism since the 1970's the strange encouragements and determinations, we didn't really need people inventing illnesses for humanity, we really didn't.
     
  9. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,102
    Anew

    I know you have been told this several times, but I am going to tell you again..

    NO ONE CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WRITE.


    At a guess, I am going to assume that you are using some sort of translating service. And it isn't working because it is obviously losing the meaning of what you are trying to convey. Because you make absolutely no sense. Perhaps you could try a different translation site, or perhaps, post in a forum where you can post in the language(s) you are comfortable with.

    Since no one knows or understands what you are on about, I am going to cesspool this thread.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page