Do they go hand in hand? Does something have to be self-aware to be intelligent? I suppose it all depends critically on how you define each term. I find a practical problem in that a strict definition is generally impossible to fully agree upon. That said, is the question irrelevant? It seems that the more specific you are about the definition, the more irrelevant the question becomes. It just seems that a requirement for an in-depth anaylsis is depth ya know? As such it is possible to process large volumes of data via a binary algorithmic blah blah but how can it do much more? Is in-depth analysis deep at all or merely an illusion? If it IS an illusion is that illusion necessary for this type of analysis "meaning of life" kind of stuff. Whassup?