UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

So why did you start a thread LITERALLY called "in defence of space aliens"?!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I didn't start this thread. James R did. He too likes to attack the strawman of "aliens" because it's just so much damn easier to disprove aliens than ufos.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Nooooo
The sun existed
The god part didn't
Those who worshipped the sun as god couldn't see the difference

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Again nooooo
Everybody knows UFOs exist
They are called Unidentified Flying Objects
They are not called FAS Flying Alien Spacecraft
You don't have to prove all sighted objects are ufos.
Nobody does anything like that

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

What's so important about hillbillies seeing shit?

You don't know what "compelling accounts" would look like, if they're there at all they're hidden behind your masses of confabulations.

 

So what's the deal with Hillbillies ?

To your last statement , what evidence do you have that these 700 unsolved cases are in fact " masses of confabulations " ?

 

Sorry, but 700 "sightings" is chump change. But if you want to insist that they're Unidentified Flying Ostriches, that's fine. You have to right to look like a fool if you so chose.

 

Chump change ? Compared to what ?

 

Really?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Really

 

Okay, so you know next to nothing about the topic. That's fine.

 

Hillbillies? Who said just hillbillies see ufos? Do you have a prejudice against poor country people?

 

I was born in rural Missouri, Chuckles. Hordes of dumbasses whose only reason for existing is to get probed by aliens.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

So how many hillbillies did you know who saw ufos?

 

Why do you presume this ?

 

Tyson is just parroting the standard gripe of every other ufo denialist---no proof the ufo is of alien origin, therefore the ufo doesn't exist. How can a man of science obviously curious about the wonders of the universe take the position of not studying these things we have thousands of accounts of and video of and photos of? He says we SHOULD be studying these things, and then acts indifferent about what they are. They are just unknown OBJECTS he claims, variables without definition. Problem is the ufo has to be a real knowable thing. It's on video. The pilot said one of them looked like a 40 ft tic tac! That's not just anything. It's a specific something that has typical characteristics seen thousands of times over the past 70 years and which has tremendous implications for our species. Go back to studying outer space Neil, at least until you've cracked a book or two on the very earthbound and hugely evidenced ufo phenomenon.

 

Not going to bother with your questions.

 

MR ;

Perhaps Neil is cracking the egg on the information on UFO's . Perhaps Neil is doing what Carl Sagan did many yrs. ago .

Sometimes , sometimes ... some people give a hint to the truth on this matter , and have to do so because .....of life .

 

The best evidence of UFO's is always the older photo's . From the early 60's late 50's . Because none of this photo manipulation was possible , if done extremely difficult and rare .

Books on the topic , the same . Much , much less redaction .

Neil is a conservative at heart which most scientists are . No surprise here . And quite frankly has to be , his job and reputation are on the line .

But the " SHOULD " in post #396 could be a hint , a slight turn in the straight road of mainstream science on the UFO topic .